M. Latour

689 total citations
38 papers, 484 citations indexed

About

M. Latour is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Latour has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 484 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25 papers in Instrumentation and 2 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in M. Latour's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (35 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (25 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (16 papers). M. Latour is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (35 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (25 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (16 papers). M. Latour collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. M. Latour's co-authors include Sebastian Kamann, Tim-Oliver Husser, S. Dreizler, J. Brinchmann, Benjamin Giesers, U. Heber, Peter M. Weilbacher, G. Fontaine, Martin Wendt and Martin M. Roth and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

M. Latour

32 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Latour Germany 14 448 221 23 19 19 38 484
V. Khalack Canada 11 344 0.8× 118 0.5× 11 0.5× 29 1.5× 12 0.6× 36 351
F. Thévenin France 5 389 0.9× 188 0.9× 12 0.5× 21 1.1× 25 1.3× 7 402
A. H. Córsico Argentina 6 335 0.7× 151 0.7× 12 0.5× 16 0.8× 13 0.7× 9 350
Tyler M. Heintz United States 5 344 0.8× 185 0.8× 25 1.1× 21 1.1× 10 0.5× 6 368
M. Grosso Argentina 12 565 1.3× 203 0.9× 14 0.6× 40 2.1× 21 1.1× 23 576
J McCleery United Kingdom 4 334 0.7× 171 0.8× 11 0.5× 27 1.4× 14 0.7× 4 363
N. Gorlova Belgium 12 618 1.4× 155 0.7× 15 0.7× 17 0.9× 20 1.1× 19 626
B. G. Castanheira United States 15 576 1.3× 253 1.1× 30 1.3× 41 2.2× 21 1.1× 31 598
K. Suchomska Chile 12 428 1.0× 186 0.8× 22 1.0× 28 1.5× 39 2.1× 22 447
Elizabeth Jeffery United States 11 517 1.2× 267 1.2× 21 0.9× 25 1.3× 28 1.5× 21 531

Countries citing papers authored by M. Latour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Latour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Latour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Latour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Latour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Latour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Latour. The network helps show where M. Latour may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Latour

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Latour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Latour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Latour. M. Latour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Latour, M., Sebastian Kamann, S. Martocchia, et al.. (2025). A stellar census in globular clusters with MUSE. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 694. A248–A248. 3 indexed citations
2.
Wang, Z., Anil C. Seth, M. Latour, et al.. (2025). oMEGACat. VII. Tracing Interstellar and Intracluster Medium of ω Centauri Using Sodium Absorptions. The Astrophysical Journal. 994(2). 143–143. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pietrukowicz, P., M. Latour, I. Soszyński, et al.. (2025). Observational Parameters of Blue Large-amplitude Pulsators*. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 279(1). 21–21.
4.
Seth, Anil C., Z. Wang, S. O. Souza, et al.. (2025). oMEGACat. V. Helium Enrichment in ω Centauri as a Function of Metallicity. The Astrophysical Journal. 984(2). 162–162. 3 indexed citations
5.
Neumayer, Nadine, Anil C. Seth, A. P. Milone, et al.. (2024). oMEGACat. III. Multiband Photometry and Metallicities Reveal Spatially Well-mixed Populations within ω Centauri’s Half-light Radius. The Astrophysical Journal. 970(2). 152–152. 10 indexed citations
6.
Neumayer, Nadine, Andrea Bellini, Mattia Libralato, et al.. (2024). oMEGACat. II. Photometry and Proper Motions for 1.4 Million Stars in Omega Centauri and Its Rotation in the Plane of the Sky. The Astrophysical Journal. 970(2). 192–192. 10 indexed citations
7.
Seth, Anil C., Aaron Dotter, Nadine Neumayer, et al.. (2024). oMEGACat. IV. Constraining the Ages of Omega Centauri Subgiant Branch Stars with HST and MUSE. The Astrophysical Journal. 977(1). 14–14. 6 indexed citations
8.
Kamann, Sebastian, Sara Saracino, M. Latour, et al.. (2024). Studying binary systems in Omega Centauri with MUSE – I. Detection of spectroscopic binaries. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 535(1). 781–792. 2 indexed citations
9.
Neumayer, Nadine, Anil C. Seth, Tim-Oliver Husser, et al.. (2023). oMEGACat. I. MUSE Spectroscopy of 300,000 Stars within the Half-light Radius of ω Centauri. The Astrophysical Journal. 958(1). 8–8. 15 indexed citations
10.
Latour, M., et al.. (2020). Heavy-metal enrichment of intermediate He-sdOB stars: the pulsators Feige 46 and LS IV–14°116 revisited. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 15 indexed citations
11.
Husser, Tim-Oliver, M. Latour, J. Brinchmann, et al.. (2020). A stellar census in globular clusters with MUSE. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 635. A114–A114. 24 indexed citations
12.
Latour, M., et al.. (2019). Heavy metal enrichment in the intermediate He-sdOB pulsator Feige 46. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 11 indexed citations
13.
Latour, M., Tim-Oliver Husser, Benjamin Giesers, et al.. (2019). A stellar census in globular clusters with MUSE: multiple populations chemistry in NGC 2808. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 20 indexed citations
14.
Fontaine, G., P. Bergeron, P. Brassard, et al.. (2019). Testing Seismic Models of Hot B Subdwarfs with Gaia Data. The Astrophysical Journal. 880(2). 79–79. 4 indexed citations
15.
Bell, Keaton J., Alekzander Kosakowski, Mukremin Kilic, et al.. (2019). A Hot Subdwarf B Star Eclipsed by a Low-mass White Dwarf in TESS Data. Research Notes of the AAS. 3(6). 81–81. 3 indexed citations
16.
Latour, M., et al.. (2019). Heavy metals in intermediate He-rich hot subdwarfs: the chemical composition of HZ 44 and HD 127493. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 22 indexed citations
17.
Németh, Péter, et al.. (2018). A quantitative NLTE analysis of visual and ultraviolet spectra of four helium-rich subdwarf O stars. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 14 indexed citations
18.
Latour, M., P. Chayer, E. M. Green, A. Irrgang, & G. Fontaine. (2018). Spectral analysis of four surprisingly similar hot hydrogen-rich subdwarf O stars. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 11 indexed citations
19.
Latour, M., et al.. (2018). Spectral analysis of the He-enriched sdO-star HD 127493. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
20.
Latour, M., U. Heber, A. Irrgang, et al.. (2016). Quantitative spectral analysis of the sdB star HD 188112: A helium-core white dwarf progenitor. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026