M. King
- Topics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers)Particle Detector Development and Performance (2 papers)High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
M. King
1 paper receiving 2 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 1 of 1
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2
Countries citing papers authored by M. King
This map shows the geographic impact of M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. King. The network helps show where M. King may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 |
About M. King
M. King is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 2 papers that have together received 2 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (2 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2 citations), Infectious Diseases (0 citations) and Organic Chemistry (0 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.