Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Giant Planet Imaged in the Disk of the Young Star β Pictoris
2010422 citationsG. Chauvin, Dániel Apai et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Kasper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Kasper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Kasper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Kasper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Kasper. The network helps show where M. Kasper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Kasper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Kasper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Kasper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Kasper. M. Kasper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sauvage, Jean-François, Thierry Fusco, J. H. Girard, et al.. (2016). Tackling down the low wind effect on SPHERE instrument. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9909. 990916–990916.23 indexed citations
Girard, J. H., M. Janson, Sascha P. Quanz, et al.. (2010). Coronagraphic Upgrades at the VLT/NaCo: 4-Micron APP Enhanced Spectroscopy?.1 indexed citations
13.
Kenworthy, Matthew D., Sascha P. Quanz, M. Meyer, et al.. (2010). A New Coronagraph for NAOS-CONICA -- the Apodising Phase Plate. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 141. 2–4.3 indexed citations
14.
Mayer, Andreas, et al.. (2010). Vert particle filter test procedure and quality standard for new and in-use diesel engines. Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport. 313–322.2 indexed citations
15.
Kasper, M., Paola Amico, E. Pompei, et al.. (2009). Direct imaging of exoplanets and brown dwarfs with the VLT: NACO pupil-stabilised Lyot coronagraphy at 4 µm. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 137(137). 8–13.8 indexed citations
16.
Burtscher, H., et al.. (2009). Air quality filtration in vehicle cabins. Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport. 59–69.
17.
Martinez, P., et al.. (2009). Halftoning for High-contrast Imaging: Developments for the SPHERE and EPICS Instruments. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 137. 18–23.1 indexed citations
18.
Kasper, M. & W. Brandner. (2005). Science with adaptive optics : proceedings of the ESO workshop held at Garching, Germany, 16-19 September 2003. Springer eBooks.1 indexed citations
19.
Hippler, S. & M. Kasper. (2004). Dem Seeing ein Schnippchen schlagen. Adaptive Optik in der Astronomie Teil I. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 43(10). 32–42.1 indexed citations
20.
Hippler, S., et al.. (2002). Simultaneous measurements of the Fried parameter r 0 and the isoplanatic angle θ 0 using SCIDAR and adaptive optics - First results. ASPC. 266. 86.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.