Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Mutualism Between Ants and Honeydew-Producing Homoptera
This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Way's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Way with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Way more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Way. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Way. The network helps show where M. J. Way may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. J. Way
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. J. Way.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. J. Way based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. J. Way. M. J. Way is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Way, M. J., et al.. (2017). Cacosceles (Zelogenes) newmannii (Thomson) (Cerambycidae: Prioninae), a new pest in the South African sugarcane industry.. 62–65.7 indexed citations
2.
Way, M. J., et al.. (2015). First record of yellow sugarcane aphid, Sipha flava (Homoptera: Aphididae), in the South African sugarcane industry.. 47(3). 37–40.7 indexed citations
3.
McFarlane, S. A., Patrick Govender, M. J. Way, et al.. (2014). Report on maize streak virus in the South African sugar industry. International sugar journal. 116(1385). 348–354.1 indexed citations
Way, M. J., D. E. Conlong, & R. S. Rutherford. (2011). Biosecurity against invasive alien insect pests: a case study of Chilo sacchariphagus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in the Southern African region.. International sugar journal. 114(1361). 359–363.1 indexed citations
6.
Way, M. J., et al.. (2011). Monitoring white grub beetle larvae (Scarabaeidae) in sugarcane in the Midlands North region of Kwazulu-Natal.. 314–325.4 indexed citations
Scott, J. K. & M. J. Way. (1990). A survey in South Africa for potential biological control agents against capeweed, Arctotheca calendula (L.) Levyns (Asteraceae).. Plant protection quarterly. 5(1). 31–34.3 indexed citations
12.
Scott, J. K. & M. J. Way. (1990). The phytophagous insects of Emex australis Steinheil in southern Africa and their potential for biological control in Australia.. Plant protection quarterly. 5(2). 43–48.4 indexed citations
13.
Way, M. J. & K. C. Khoo. (1989). Relationships between Helopeltis theobromae damage and ants with special reference to Malaysian cocoa smallholdings.. Journal of Plant Protection. 6(1). 1–11.28 indexed citations
14.
Scott, J. K. & M. J. Way. (1989). Biology of Rhytirrhinus inaequalis (F.), a weevil associated with Emex australis Steinh. (Polygonaceae) in southern Africa.. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa. 52(1). 1–9.2 indexed citations
15.
Scott, J. K. & M. J. Way. (1989). Host plant specificity and biology of Rhodometra sacraria (L.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in South Africa.. Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa. 52(2). 245–251.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.