M. J. Frederick

429 total citations
10 papers, 342 citations indexed

About

M. J. Frederick is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, M. J. Frederick has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 342 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Materials Chemistry, 6 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and 5 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in M. J. Frederick's work include Copper Interconnects and Reliability (5 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (4 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers). M. J. Frederick is often cited by papers focused on Copper Interconnects and Reliability (5 papers), Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (4 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (4 papers). M. J. Frederick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. M. J. Frederick's co-authors include Ganpati Ramanath, Ashavani Kumar, W. N. Gill, Joel L. Plawsky, R. K. Saxena, Saurabh Agrawal, Ganapathiraman Ramanath, Katherine Turner, R. Baskaran and Anyuan Cao and has published in prestigious journals such as Advanced Materials, Journal of Applied Physics and Advanced Functional Materials.

In The Last Decade

M. J. Frederick

10 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. J. Frederick United States	9	211	147	125	59	48	10	342
J. Leib United States	9	268 1.3×	124 0.8×	138 1.1×	67 1.1×	62 1.3×	17	414
Rand Dannenberg United States	8	262 1.2×	237 1.6×	69 0.6×	49 0.8×	37 0.8×	15	412
J. Dudonis Lithuania	13	327 1.5×	147 1.0×	71 0.6×	37 0.6×	31 0.6×	34	427
Kyoung‐Bo Kim South Korea	12	214 1.0×	227 1.5×	72 0.6×	45 0.8×	40 0.8×	57	358
T. Klotzbücher Germany	10	185 0.9×	120 0.8×	116 0.9×	151 2.6×	67 1.4×	25	387
Pallavi Pandit India	12	204 1.0×	156 1.1×	69 0.6×	42 0.7×	46 1.0×	28	338
J.-G. Fan United States	7	151 0.7×	90 0.6×	90 0.7×	154 2.6×	46 1.0×	8	361
J. Benedict United States	8	140 0.7×	205 1.4×	48 0.4×	79 1.3×	67 1.4×	19	351
Hepeng Ding United States	10	424 2.0×	102 0.7×	134 1.1×	35 0.6×	35 0.7×	13	496
K. P. Adhi India	14	294 1.4×	156 1.1×	184 1.5×	77 1.3×	39 0.8×	40	500

Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Frederick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Frederick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Frederick. The network helps show where M. J. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. J. Frederick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. J. Frederick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. J. Frederick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. J. Frederick. M. J. Frederick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Frederick, M. J., et al.. (2017). The role of hydrogen in zirconium alloy corrosion. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 496. 301–312. 35 indexed citations

2.

Makala, Raghuveer S., et al.. (2006). Site‐Selective Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes. Advanced Materials. 18(5). 547–552. 49 indexed citations

3.

Agrawal, Saurabh, Ashavani Kumar, M. J. Frederick, & Ganapathiraman Ramanath. (2005). Hybrid Microstructures from Aligned Carbon Nanotubes and Silica Particles. Small. 1(8-9). 823–826. 33 indexed citations

4.

Agrawal, Saurabh, M. J. Frederick, Fabio Lupo, et al.. (2005). Directed Growth and Electrical‐ Transport Properties of Carbon Nanotube Architectures on Indium Tin Oxide Films on Silicon‐Based Substrates. Advanced Functional Materials. 15(12). 1922–1926. 19 indexed citations

5.

Saxena, R. K., M. J. Frederick, Ganpati Ramanath, W. N. Gill, & Joel L. Plawsky. (2005). Kinetics of voiding and agglomeration of copper nanolayers on silica. Physical Review B. 72(11). 62 indexed citations

6.

Frederick, M. J. & Ganpati Ramanath. (2004). Interfacial phase formation in Cu–Mg alloy films on SiO2. Journal of Applied Physics. 95(6). 3202–3205. 25 indexed citations

7.

Frederick, M. J., et al.. (2003). Sequence of Mg segregation, grain growth, and interfacial MgO formation in Cu–Mg alloy films on SiO2 during vacuum annealing. Journal of Applied Physics. 93(10). 5966–5972. 47 indexed citations

8.

Cao, Anyuan, R. Baskaran, M. J. Frederick, et al.. (2003). Direction‐Selective and Length‐Tunable In‐Plane Growth of Carbon Nanotubes. Advanced Materials. 15(13). 1105–1109. 51 indexed citations

9.

Frederick, M. J. & Ganpati Ramanath. (2003). Kinetics of interfacial reaction in Cu–Mg alloy films on SiO2. Journal of Applied Physics. 95(1). 363–366. 18 indexed citations

10.

Shin, Cheung Soo, et al.. (2000). Electromigration in Epitaxial Copper Lines. MRS Proceedings. 648. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact