M. J. Correia
- Neurology top 1%
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Civil and Structural Engineering top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Katherine J. RennieDora E. AngelakiJ. David DickmanK. E. MoneyW. Carroll HixsonDaniel G. LangJorma I. NivenJack P. Landolt
- Topics
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (20 papers)Vestibular and auditory disorders (19 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPortugalUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
M. J. Correia
51 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Neurology 620
- Sensory Systems 526
- Civil and Structural Engineering 431
- Cognitive Neuroscience 317
- Materials Chemistry 278
Countries citing papers authored by M. J. Correia
This map shows the geographic impact of M. J. Correia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. J. Correia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. J. Correia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. J. Correia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. J. Correia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. J. Correia. The network helps show where M. J. Correia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. J. Correia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. J. Correia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. J. Correia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. J. Correia. M. J. Correia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | Morphometric studies of type I and type II hair cells in the gerbil's posterior semicircular canal crista. | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 156 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | An Experimental Approach to the Dynamics of the Vestibular Mechanisms | 5 |
About M. J. Correia
M. J. Correia is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Developmental Biology and Neurology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (20 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (19 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (526 citations), Neurology (620 citations) and Developmental Biology (54 citations). M. J. Correia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Portugal and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Katherine J. Rennie, Dora E. Angelaki, J. David Dickman, K. E. Money, W. Carroll Hixson, Daniel G. Lang, Jorma I. Niven, Jack P. Landolt, Fred E. Guedry and Thomas J. Anastasio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Brain Research and Journal of Applied Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.