M. Hoke

3.1k total citations
68 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

M. Hoke is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Signal Processing and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Hoke has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 9 papers in Signal Processing and 9 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in M. Hoke's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (21 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (21 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers). M. Hoke is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (21 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (21 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers). M. Hoke collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. M. Hoke's co-authors include Christo Pantev, Bernd Lütkenhöner, Klaus Lehnertz, S. Hampson, C Pantev, Scott Makeig, Gian Luca Romani, F. Grandori, G. Anogianakis and Róbert Galambos and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and European Heart Journal.

In The Last Decade

M. Hoke

58 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Hoke Germany 22 2.1k 428 317 264 147 68 2.4k
Bernd Lütkenhöner Germany 30 2.8k 1.3× 606 1.4× 490 1.5× 406 1.5× 98 0.7× 98 3.2k
E. Kaukoranta Finland 17 1.9k 0.9× 560 1.3× 116 0.4× 155 0.6× 71 0.5× 22 2.1k
S. Hampson Germany 15 1.6k 0.8× 383 0.9× 103 0.3× 169 0.6× 149 1.0× 16 1.9k
Manfried Hoke Germany 10 1.0k 0.5× 181 0.4× 82 0.3× 112 0.4× 68 0.5× 13 1.3k
Cheryl J. Aine United States 29 1.7k 0.8× 338 0.8× 101 0.3× 162 0.6× 184 1.3× 65 2.1k
Mark Jude Tramo United States 20 1.6k 0.8× 500 1.2× 98 0.3× 143 0.5× 69 0.5× 26 1.9k
Ruurd Schoonhoven Netherlands 16 947 0.5× 101 0.2× 430 1.4× 62 0.2× 154 1.0× 44 1.2k
Nicole Ille Germany 12 1.6k 0.7× 242 0.6× 68 0.2× 157 0.6× 141 1.0× 17 1.7k
Patricia Morosan Germany 15 2.1k 1.0× 377 0.9× 116 0.4× 82 0.3× 118 0.8× 22 2.5k
Patrick J. Ledden United States 16 3.2k 1.5× 458 1.1× 157 0.5× 71 0.3× 117 0.8× 26 3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Hoke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Hoke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Hoke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Hoke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Hoke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Hoke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Hoke. The network helps show where M. Hoke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Hoke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Hoke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Hoke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Hoke. M. Hoke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hoke, M., et al.. (2011). The impact of dental disease on mortality in patients with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis. Swiss Medical Weekly. 141(2930). w13236–w13236. 15 indexed citations
2.
Csépe, Valéria, et al.. (1997). Mismatch field to tone pairs: neuromagnetic evidence for temporal integration at the sensory level. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 104(1). 1–9. 14 indexed citations
3.
Elbert, Thomas, Brigitte Rockstroh, S. Hampson, Christo Pantev, & M. Hoke. (1994). The magnetic counterpart of the contingent negative variation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 92(3). 262–272. 38 indexed citations
4.
Pantev, Christo, Thomas Elbert, Scott Makeig, et al.. (1993). Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section. 88(5). 389–396. 118 indexed citations
5.
Lütkenhöner, Bernd, Klaus Lehnertz, M. Hoke, & Christo Pantev. (1991). On the Biomagnetic Inverse Problem in the Case of Multiple Dipoles. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 111(sup491). 94–105. 22 indexed citations
6.
Hoke, M., Christo Pantev, Bernd Lütkenhöner, & Klaus Lehnertz. (1991). Auditory Cortical Basis of Tinnitus. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 111(sup491). 176–182. 13 indexed citations
7.
Erné, S. N. & M. Hoke. (1990). Short-latency evoked magnetic fields from the human auditory brainstem.. PubMed. 54. 167–76. 7 indexed citations
8.
Pantev, Christo, et al.. (1990). Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatiotemporal resolution through combination of neuromagnetic source localization (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 75(3). 173–184. 107 indexed citations
9.
Hoke, M., H. Feldmann, Christo Pantev, Bernd Lütkenhöner, & Klaus Lehnertz. (1989). Objective evidence of tinnitus in auditory evoked magnetic fields. Hearing Research. 37(3). 281–286. 66 indexed citations
10.
Pantev, Christo, M. Hoke, Klaus Lehnertz, & Bernd Lütkenhöner. (1989). Neuromagnetic evidence of an amplitopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 72(3). 225–231. 129 indexed citations
11.
Pantev, Christo, et al.. (1989). Tinnitus remission objectified by neuromagnetic measurements. Hearing Research. 40(3). 261–264. 27 indexed citations
12.
Hoke, M., et al.. (1988). Binaural interaction in brainstem auditory evoked potentials elicited by frequency-specific stimuli. Hearing Research. 35(1). 9–19. 46 indexed citations
13.
Anninos, P., G. Anogianakis, Klaus Lehnertz, C Pantev, & M. Hoke. (1987). Biomagnetic Measurements Using Squids. International Journal of Neuroscience. 37(3-4). 149–168. 26 indexed citations
14.
Pantev, C, et al.. (1986). Causes of differences in the input-output characteristics of simultaneously recorded auditory evoked magnetic fields and potentials.. PubMed. 25(4-5). 263–76. 15 indexed citations
15.
Hoke, M., Robert E. Wickesberg, & Bernd Lütkenhöner. (1984). Time- and Intensity-Dependent Low-Pass Filtering of Auditory Brain Stem Responses. International Journal of Audiology. 23(2). 195–205. 11 indexed citations
16.
Hoke, M., et al.. (1980). Deconvolution of compound action potentials and nonlinear features of the PST histogram. Hearing Research. 2(3-4). 573–579. 2 indexed citations
17.
Hoke, M., et al.. (1979). Influence of the intratympanic recording site on the frequency response of cochlear microphonics.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 11. 65–71. 1 indexed citations
18.
Lütkenhöner, Bernd, et al.. (1979). Effect of recovery properties on the discharge pattern of auditory nerve fibres.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 11. 25–43. 11 indexed citations
19.
Hoke, M., et al.. (1970). Untersuchungen über die Innenohrmechanik an einem nichtlinearen elektronischen Modell. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 196(2). 142–148. 2 indexed citations
20.
Hoke, M., et al.. (1968). [On the nonlinearity of inner ear mechanics].. PubMed. 191(2). 577–81. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026