M. Hoke
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 21
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 21
- Neural dynamics and brain function 16
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 4
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 6
- Signal Processing top 2%
- Blind Source Separation Techniques 7
- Neurology top 10%
-
- Neural Networks and Applications 9
-
- Noise Effects and Management 5
- Co-authors
- Christo PantevBernd LütkenhönerKlaus LehnertzS. HampsonC PantevScott MakeigGian Luca RomaniF. Grandori
- Journals
- European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (7 papers)Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology (6 papers)Acta Oto-Laryngologica (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaUnited States
In The Last Decade
M. Hoke
58 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
- Sensory Systems 317
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 428
- Signal Processing 264
- Neurology 110
Countries citing papers authored by M. Hoke
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Hoke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Hoke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Hoke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Hoke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Hoke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Hoke. The network helps show where M. Hoke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Hoke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 74 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 38 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 118 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 22 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 12 | Short-latency evoked magnetic fields from the human auditory brainstem. | 1990 | 7 |
| 13 | 1990 | 107 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 66 | |
| 15 | 1989 | 27 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 26 | |
| 18 | 1980 | 2 | |
| 19 | Effect of recovery properties on the discharge pattern of auditory nerve fibres. | 1979 | 11 |
| 20 | Influence of the intratympanic recording site on the frequency response of cochlear microphonics. | 1979 | 1 |
About M. Hoke
M. Hoke is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Signal Processing, having authored 68 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (21 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (21 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (16 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (9 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (7 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k citations), Sensory Systems (317 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (428 citations). M. Hoke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christo Pantev, Bernd Lütkenhöner, Klaus Lehnertz, S. Hampson, C Pantev, Scott Makeig, Gian Luca Romani, F. Grandori, G. Anogianakis and Róbert Galambos. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Hearing Research and International Journal of Audiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.