Cheryl J. Aine
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Neural dynamics and brain function 27
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 24
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 14
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 13
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 9
-
- Multisensory perception and integration 9
- Sensory Systems top 5%
-
- Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications 8
- Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications 6
- Signal Processing top 5%
- Co-authors
- Selma SupekM. Russell HarterJulia M. StephenCharles E. SchroederD.M. RankenJohn GeorgeJohn C. AdairE. Best
- Partner nations
- United StatesCroatiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Cheryl J. Aine
65 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 338
- Sensory Systems 101
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 373
- Signal Processing 162
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl J. Aine
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl J. Aine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl J. Aine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl J. Aine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl J. Aine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl J. Aine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl J. Aine. The network helps show where Cheryl J. Aine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheryl J. Aine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 70 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 56 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 28 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 90 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 76 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 156 | |
| 18 | Comparative studies of brain activation with MEG and functional MRI | 1993 | 3 |
| 19 | 1993 | 120 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 17 |
About Cheryl J. Aine
Cheryl J. Aine is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Health Informatics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (27 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (24 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (14 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (9 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (338 citations) and Sensory Systems (101 citations). Cheryl J. Aine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Croatia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Selma Supek, M. Russell Harter, Julia M. Stephen, Charles E. Schroeder, D.M. Ranken, John George, John C. Adair, E. Best, Janice E. Knoefel and Eldon L. Foltz. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Neurology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.