Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: Results from a prospective multinational study
2012316 citationsFlorence Tubach, Philippe Ravaud et al.Arthritis Care & Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Hochberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Hochberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Hochberg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Hochberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Hochberg. The network helps show where M. Hochberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Hochberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Hochberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Hochberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Hochberg. M. Hochberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tubach, Florence, Philippe Ravaud, E. Martín‐Mola, et al.. (2012). Minimum clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state in pain and function in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, chronic back pain, hand osteoarthritis, and hip and knee osteoarthritis: Results from a prospective multinational study. Arthritis Care & Research. 64(11). 1699–1707.316 indexed citations breakdown →
Tubach, Florence, Gabriel Baron, Philippe Ravaud, et al.. (2003). Evaluation of clinically relevant changes and states in symptomatic outcome variables in osteoarthritis. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 48(9). 276–276.5 indexed citations
11.
Pham, Tri Nhut, D. van der Heijde, Nicholas Bellamy, et al.. (2002). OMERACT-OARSI Initiative: OARSI set of responder criteria for osteoarthritis (OA) clinical trials revisited. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 10.1 indexed citations
12.
Lane, N.E., M. Hochberg, Alice Pressman, Jean C. Scott, & Michael C. Nevitt. (1999). Recreational physical activity and the risk of osteoarthritis of the hip in elderly women.. PubMed. 26(4). 849–54.49 indexed citations
Roubenoff, Ronenn, Francis M. Giardiello, M. Hochberg, et al.. (1989). Collagenous colitis, enteropathic arthritis, and autoimmune diseases: results of a patient survey.. PubMed. 16(9). 1229–32.40 indexed citations
17.
Hochberg, M., et al.. (1988). Physical disability and psychosocial dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus.. The Journal of Rheumatology. 15(6). 959.30 indexed citations
18.
Hochberg, M., et al.. (1985). Validity and yield of a two-stage screening procedure for systemic lupus erythematosus.. PubMed. 1(1). 67–71.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.