M. Hennebach

456 total citations
11 papers, 121 citations indexed

About

M. Hennebach is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Hennebach has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 121 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 6 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 4 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in M. Hennebach's work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers). M. Hennebach is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (3 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers). M. Hennebach collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and France. M. Hennebach's co-authors include M. Schmid, P. Indelicato, D. Gotta, L. M. Simons, J.‐P. Egger, G. Borchert, D. F. Anagnostopoulos, Alan Wells, Yiwei Liu and B. Manil and has published in prestigious journals such as Physics Letters B, Physical Review A and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

M. Hennebach

9 papers receiving 118 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Hennebach Switzerland 6 52 51 48 26 26 11 121
J.R. Boyce United States 7 35 0.7× 86 1.7× 50 1.0× 93 3.6× 22 0.8× 17 146
F. Khalfallah Algeria 9 45 0.9× 89 1.7× 17 0.4× 117 4.5× 11 0.4× 15 154
M. Lacroix Belgium 5 45 0.9× 42 0.8× 25 0.5× 54 2.1× 7 0.3× 17 101
R. Openshaw Canada 7 19 0.4× 48 0.9× 13 0.3× 86 3.3× 9 0.3× 19 122
V. Pesudo Spain 8 41 0.8× 58 1.1× 24 0.5× 86 3.3× 19 0.7× 19 139
Katherine Mesick United States 8 42 0.8× 65 1.3× 10 0.2× 32 1.2× 24 0.9× 12 128
S. Korolczuk Poland 8 33 0.6× 157 3.1× 36 0.8× 74 2.8× 24 0.9× 25 184
M. Lundin Sweden 8 48 0.9× 81 1.6× 13 0.3× 70 2.7× 12 0.5× 26 171
M. Maslov United Kingdom 6 35 0.7× 26 0.5× 23 0.5× 103 4.0× 56 2.2× 11 147
F. Ibrahim France 7 49 0.9× 66 1.3× 30 0.6× 132 5.1× 25 1.0× 16 176

Countries citing papers authored by M. Hennebach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Hennebach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Hennebach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Hennebach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Hennebach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Hennebach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Hennebach. The network helps show where M. Hennebach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Hennebach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Hennebach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Hennebach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Hennebach. M. Hennebach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Trassinelli, M., D. F. Anagnostopoulos, G. Borchert, et al.. (2016). Measurement of the charged pion mass using X-ray spectroscopy of exotic atoms. Physics Letters B. 759. 583–588. 20 indexed citations
2.
Hennebach, M., et al.. (2015). MOCABA: A general Monte Carlo–Bayes procedure for improved predictions of integral functions of nuclear data. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 77. 514–521. 47 indexed citations
3.
Schlesser, S., D. S. Covita, J.M.F. dos Santos, et al.. (2013). High-accuracy x-ray line standards in the 3-keV region. Physical Review A. 88(2). 13 indexed citations
4.
Hennebach, M., et al.. (2007). Monte Carlo calculations of the REBUS critical experiment for validation of burn-up credit. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology).
5.
Indelicato, P., Éric-Olivier Le Bigot, M. Trassinelli, et al.. (2006). Characterization of a charge-coupled device array for Bragg spectroscopy. Review of Scientific Instruments. 77(4). 6 indexed citations
6.
Manil, B., D. F. Anagnostopoulos, S. Biri, et al.. (2003). Measurement of the Strong Interaction Shift and Width of the Ground State of Pionic Hydrogen. Hyperfine Interactions. 146-147(1-4). 343–347. 1 indexed citations
7.
Anagnostopoulos, D. F., M. Cargnelli, H. Fuhrmann, et al.. (2003). Precision measurements in pionic hydrogen. Nuclear Physics A. 721. C849–C852. 6 indexed citations
8.
Anagnostopoulos, D. F., G. Borchert, J.‐P. Egger, et al.. (2002). A large area CCD X-ray detector for exotic atom spectroscopy. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 484(1-3). 419–431. 26 indexed citations
9.
Gotta, D., M. Hennebach, V. E. Markushin, et al.. (2002). The pionic hydrogen experiment at PSI. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics. 52(S2). B169–B174.
10.
Borchert, G., B. Manil, D. F. Anagnostopoulos, et al.. (2001). Precision Measurement of the Charged Pion Mass by High Resolution X-Ray Spectroscopy. Hyperfine Interactions. 132(1-4). 195–207. 1 indexed citations
11.
Anagnostopoulos, D. F., G. Borchert, D. Gotta, et al.. (2000). Mass of the Charged Pion. Acta Physica Polonica B. 31(10). 2219. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026