M. Harper

470 citations
8 papers · 270 · h-index 7

Impact in

  • Urology top 2%
    • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
    • Urological Disorders and Treatments
    • Ion Channels and Receptors

Papers in

    • Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research 5
    • Urticaria and Related Conditions 1

M. Harper

7 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

M. Harper
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Urology 195
  • Sensory Systems 51
  • Rheumatology 71
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 23
  • Gastroenterology 11
Replace Mário Reis with:
Mário Reis Portugal
G. Gonzales United Kingdom
André Silva Portugal
Katsuhiro Ashitomi Japan
Koichi Miyamae Japan
Miguel Guimarães Portugal
Stefan G De Wachter Netherlands
Baojun Gu China
Masafumi Kita Japan
Yuan‐Chi Shen Taiwan
M. Harper relative to Mário Reis Portugal Mário Reis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Mário Reis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Harper. The network helps show where M. Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Harper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Harper Line = papers co-authored together M. Harper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2004166
2 200433
3 200522
4
Episiotomy repair: Vicryl versus Vicryl rapide.
200021
5 200712
6 20039
7 20027
8 20250

About M. Harper

M. Harper is a scholar working on Urology, Rheumatology, Surgery, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (5 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (1 paper), Hernia repair and management (1 paper), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (1 paper), Menstrual Health and Disorders (1 paper), Polyomavirus and related diseases (1 paper) and Urticaria and Related Conditions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (195 citations), Sensory Systems (51 citations), Rheumatology (71 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (23 citations) and Gastroenterology (11 citations). M. Harper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Clare J. Fowler, Apostolos Apostolidis, Praveen Anand, Y. Yiangou, Francesco Scaravilli, Ciaran Brady, Alex Freeman, A. G. Beckett, Thomas S. Jacques and Prokar Dasgupta. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Urology, Cell Reports Physical Science, Multiple Sclerosis Journal, European Urology Supplements and Nature Clinical Practice Urology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact