M. Frederick

526 citations
9 papers · 385 indexed · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

M. Frederick

9 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

M. Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 222
  • General Health Professions 119
  • Pharmacy 21
  • Applied Psychology 17
  • Epidemiology 113
Replace Anna-Kristin Brettschneider with:
Anna-Kristin Brettschneider Germany
Marion E. Hare United States
Jessica Appleton Australia
C G Olsen United States
Ieda Regina Lopes Del Ciampo Brazil
J Lynch United Kingdom
Susan Wilhelm United States
Rui S. Xiao United States
Davoud Shojaeezadeh Iran
Samah Alageel Saudi Arabia
M. Frederick relative to Anna-Kristin Brettschneider Germany Anna-Kristin Brettschneider's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Anna-Kristin Brettschneider · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Frederick. The network helps show where M. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. Frederick Line = papers co-authored together M. Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Clinicopathological study of exfoliative dermatitis.
200810
2 200724
3
Goltz Syndrome (Focal Dermal Hypoplasia)
20051
4 20051
5 20045
6
Risk behaviors of persons with heterosexually acquired HIV infection in the United States: results of a multistate surveillance project.
199428
7 1994170
8 1994126
9 199220

About M. Frederick

M. Frederick is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Dermatology and Epidemiology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (2 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (222 citations), General Health Professions (119 citations), Pharmacy (21 citations), Applied Psychology (17 citations) and Epidemiology (113 citations). M. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Pakistan and India. Frequent co-authors include Eva Obarzanek, Edward Lakatos, Charles Maynard, Adam Atherly, Thomas M. Wickizer, Kenneth Stark, Thomas D. Koepsell, Antoinette Krupski, Kurt T. Barnhart and Carolyn Westhoff. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, American Journal of Public Health, Circulation, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics and American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026