Countries citing papers authored by M. Ferro-Luzzi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Ferro-Luzzi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Ferro-Luzzi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Ferro-Luzzi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Ferro-Luzzi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Ferro-Luzzi. The network helps show where M. Ferro-Luzzi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Ferro-Luzzi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Ferro-Luzzi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Ferro-Luzzi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Ferro-Luzzi. M. Ferro-Luzzi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Alemany, R., R. Matev, Giulia Papotti, et al.. (2017). How well do we know our beams. CERN Bulletin. 119–124.2 indexed citations
2.
Roncarolo, F., et al.. (2016). Status of the beam profile measurements at the LHC. CERN Bulletin. 163–170.
3.
Alici, A., P. Hopchev, W. Kozanecki, et al.. (2012). Study of the LHC ghost charge and satellite bunches for luminosity calibration.. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
4.
Barschel, C., et al.. (2012). Results of the LHC DCCT Calibration Studies. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
5.
Anders, C. F., C. Gabaldon, P. Hopchev, et al.. (2012). STUDY OF THE RELATIVE LHC BUNCH POPULATIONS FOR LUMINOSITY CALIBRATION. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
6.
Ferro-Luzzi, M., W. Herr, & Tatiana Pieloni. (2008). LHC bunch filling schemes for commissioning and initial luminosity optimization. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).3 indexed citations
Poolman, H. R., J. F. J. van den Brand, H. J. Bulten, et al.. (2000). A polarized internal target for storage rings. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 439(1). 91–110.2 indexed citations
9.
Higinbotham, D. W., Ricardo Alarcón, Th. S. Bauer, et al.. (2000). Recoil detection with a polarized He target. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 444(3). 557–568.2 indexed citations
Zhou, Z.-L., M. Ferro-Luzzi, J. F. J. van den Brand, H. J. Bulten, & J. Lang. (1998). Ion-extraction polarimetry for tensor polarized deuterium internal targets. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 405(1). 165–175.4 indexed citations
Zhou, Z.-L., M. Ferro-Luzzi, J. F. J. van den Brand, et al.. (1996). Ion-extraction polarimetry for polarized internal targets. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 379(2). 212–220.7 indexed citations
Amaldi, E., C. Castagnoli, M. Ferro-Luzzi, C. Franzinetti, & A. Manfredini. (1957). Further results on antiproton annihilations. Il Nuovo Cimento. 5(6). 1797–1800.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.