M. E. Sartor

512 total citations
11 papers, 410 citations indexed

About

M. E. Sartor is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Food Science and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, M. E. Sartor has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 410 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 4 papers in Food Science and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in M. E. Sartor's work include Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (11 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (5 papers) and Botanical Research and Applications (4 papers). M. E. Sartor is often cited by papers focused on Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (11 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (5 papers) and Botanical Research and Applications (4 papers). M. E. Sartor collaborates with scholars based in Argentina, Italy and Germany. M. E. Sartor's co-authors include Camilo L. Quarín, Francisco Espinoza, Juan Pablo A. Ortiz, Mario H. Urbani, Carlos A. Acuña, Silvina C. Pessino, María Eugenia Cáceres, Fulvio Pupilli, Lorena Siena and Eric J. Martínez and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Botany, Crop Science and Plant Systematics and Evolution.

In The Last Decade

M. E. Sartor

11 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers

M. E. Sartor

EEBS

PS

FS

NLC

ACS

Mario H. Urbani Argentina

Carine Simioni Brazil

Marisa Toniolo Pozzobon Brazil

Diva Maria de Alencar Dusi Brazil

Tamara N. Naumova Russia

Vera Tavares de Campos Carneiro Brazil

М. Г. Николаева Russia

Ayşe Yazlık Türkiye

Don F. Grabe United States

Abiel Rindisbacher Switzerland

Mario H. Urbani Argentina

M. E. Sartor

338 ×0.9

EEBS

107 ×0.7

PS

52 ×0.8

FS

42 ×0.7

NLC

57 ×1.2

ACS

Citations per year, relative to M. E. Sartor M. E. Sartor (= 1×) peers Mario H. Urbani

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. Sartor

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. Sartor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. Sartor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. Sartor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. Sartor

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. Sartor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. Sartor. The network helps show where M. E. Sartor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. E. Sartor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. E. Sartor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. E. Sartor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. E. Sartor. M. E. Sartor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Urbani, Mario H., et al.. (2016). Relative DNA content in diploid, polyploid, and multiploid species of Paspalum (Poaceae) with relation to reproductive mode and taxonomy. Journal of Plant Research. 129(4). 697–710. 28 indexed citations

2.

Urbani, Mario H., Carlos A. Acuña, M. E. Sartor, et al.. (2016). Registration of ‘Boyero UNNE’ Bahiagrass. Journal of Plant Registrations. 11(1). 26–32. 18 indexed citations

3.

Sartor, M. E., et al.. (2016). Hybridity and autopolyploidy increase the expressivity of apospory in diploid Paspalum rufum. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift. 302(10). 1471–1481. 10 indexed citations

4.

Sartor, M. E., et al.. (2014). Analysis of variation for apomictic reproduction in diploid Paspalum rufum. Annals of Botany. 113(7). 1211–1218. 24 indexed citations

5.

Ortiz, Juan Pablo A., Camilo L. Quarín, Silvina C. Pessino, et al.. (2013). Harnessing apomictic reproduction in grasses: what we have learned from Paspalum. Annals of Botany. 112(5). 767–787. 116 indexed citations

6.

Sartor, M. E., et al.. (2013). Patterns of genetic diversity in natural populations of Paspalum agamic complexes. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 299(7). 1295–1306. 13 indexed citations

7.

Sartor, M. E., Camilo L. Quarín, Mario H. Urbani, & Francisco Espinoza. (2011). Ploidy levels and reproductive behaviour in natural populations of five Paspalum species. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 293(1-4). 31–41. 40 indexed citations

8.

Sartor, M. E., et al.. (2011). Interspecific Tetraploid Hybrids between Two Forage Grass Species: Sexual Paspalum plicatulum and Apomictic P. guenoarum. Crop Science. 51(4). 1544–1550. 28 indexed citations

9.

Sartor, M. E., et al.. (2011). Residual sexuality and its seasonal variation in natural apomictic Paspalum notatum accessions. Biologia Plantarum. 55(2). 391–395. 29 indexed citations

10.

Sartor, M. E., Camilo L. Quarín, & Francisco Espinoza. (2009). Mode of Reproduction of Colchicine‐Induced Paspalum plicatulum Tetraploids. Crop Science. 49(4). 1270–1276. 42 indexed citations

11.

Siena, Lorena, M. E. Sartor, Francisco Espinoza, Camilo L. Quarín, & Juan Pablo A. Ortiz. (2008). Genetic and embryological evidences of apomixis at the diploid level in Paspalum rufum support recurrent auto-polyploidization in the species. Sexual Plant Reproduction. 21(3). 205–215. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact