M. E. O’Neill

7.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
73 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

M. E. O’Neill is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes. According to data from OpenAlex, M. E. O’Neill has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Computational Mechanics, 18 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 14 papers in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes. Recurrent topics in M. E. O’Neill's work include Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (15 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (14 papers) and Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (12 papers). M. E. O’Neill is often cited by papers focused on Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (15 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (14 papers) and Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles (12 papers). M. E. O’Neill collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. M. E. O’Neill's co-authors include Simon L. Goren, K. Stewartson, W. R. Dean, K. B. Ranger, A. M. J. Davis, Ky L. Mathews, Howard Brenner, J. M. Dorrepaal, Samir R. Majumdar and Ramanath Majumdar and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Journal of Fluid Mechanics and Biometrics.

In The Last Decade

M. E. O’Neill

70 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

A sphere in contact with a plane wall in a slow linear sh... 1968 2026 1987 2006 1968 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. E. O’Neill United Kingdom 28 1.3k 881 730 343 321 73 2.9k
D. Salin France 38 1.7k 1.3× 818 0.9× 1.1k 1.5× 400 1.2× 328 1.0× 144 4.1k
E. Herbolzheimer United States 15 811 0.6× 261 0.3× 753 1.0× 137 0.4× 373 1.2× 21 2.6k
Jean‐Pierre Hulin France 33 1.2k 0.9× 534 0.6× 448 0.6× 170 0.5× 167 0.5× 132 3.2k
Robert L. Powell United States 37 1.0k 0.8× 323 0.4× 1.2k 1.6× 458 1.3× 1.0k 3.1× 157 4.7k
Thomas C. Halsey United States 35 1.6k 1.2× 527 0.6× 998 1.4× 274 0.8× 103 0.3× 93 5.3k
H. Kellay France 38 1.9k 1.5× 528 0.6× 997 1.4× 453 1.3× 644 2.0× 150 4.4k
C. Allain France 27 667 0.5× 190 0.2× 655 0.9× 755 2.2× 210 0.7× 78 3.1k
Nicos Martys United States 37 1.8k 1.4× 893 1.0× 439 0.6× 731 2.1× 212 0.7× 82 4.8k
James B. Knight United States 14 1.6k 1.2× 393 0.4× 818 1.1× 208 0.6× 73 0.2× 18 2.9k
L. Gary Leal United States 33 2.7k 2.1× 697 0.8× 1.9k 2.6× 827 2.4× 810 2.5× 94 5.0k

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. O’Neill. The network helps show where M. E. O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. E. O’Neill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. E. O’Neill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. E. O’Neill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. E. O’Neill. M. E. O’Neill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Clark, G., M. E. O’Neill, E. Möbius, et al.. (2009). Analysis of the Diffuse Background Components towards Efficient Use of the IBEX-lo Star Sensor for the Interstellar Flow Direction Determination. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2009. 1 indexed citations
2.
O’Neill, M. E., G. Clark, E. Mœbius, et al.. (2009). Precision Pointing in the Sky for IBEX Interstellar Flow Observations - Use of the Moon With the IBEX-Lo Star Sensor. AGUSM. 2009. 1 indexed citations
3.
O’Neill, M. E. & Ky L. Mathews. (2002). Levene Tests of Homogeneity of Variance for General Block and Treatment Designs. Biometrics. 58(1). 216–224. 66 indexed citations
4.
O’Neill, M. E. & Ky L. Mathews. (2000). Theory & Methods: A Weighted Least Squares Approach to Levene's Test of Homogeneity of Variance. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics. 42(1). 81–100. 56 indexed citations
5.
O’Neill, M. E., et al.. (1991). SLOW MOTION OF A SOLID SPHERE IN THE PRESENCE OF A NATURALLY PERMEABLE SURFACE. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics. 44(1). 91–104. 32 indexed citations
6.
O’Neill, M. E.. (1982). On tests of homogeneity of factorially-structured populations: An additive approach. Biometrika. 69(1). 167–174. 2 indexed citations
7.
Davis, A. M. J., M. E. O’Neill, & H. Brenner. (1981). Axisymmetric Stokes flows due to a rotlet or stokeslet near a hole in a plane wall: filtration flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 103. 183–205. 25 indexed citations
8.
Stewart, S. W. & M. E. O’Neill. (1980). Calculation of the frequency response of the USGS telemetered short-period seismic system. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 28 indexed citations
9.
O’Neill, M. E., et al.. (1977). The separation of Stokes flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 80(4). 785–794. 39 indexed citations
10.
O’Neill, M. E.. (1977). On the separation of a slow linear shear flow from a cylindrical ridge or trough in a plane. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik. 28(3). 439–448. 10 indexed citations
11.
O’Neill, M. E., et al.. (1977). On axisymmetric stokes flow past a torus. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik. 28(4). 541–550. 24 indexed citations
12.
Davis, A. M. J., M. E. O’Neill, & K. B. Ranger. (1975). Some properties of multi-fluid stokes flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 2(1). 1–8. 4 indexed citations
13.
Savage, J. C. & M. E. O’Neill. (1975). The relation between the Lomnitz and Futterman theories of internal friction. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 80(2). 249–251. 17 indexed citations
14.
O’Neill, M. E., et al.. (1973). On the slow viscous rotation of a body straddling the interface between two immiscible semi‐infinite fluids. Mathematika. 20(2). 175–196. 21 indexed citations
15.
Majumdar, Samir R. & M. E. O’Neill. (1972). On the Stokes resistance of two equal spheres in contact in a linear shear field. Chemical Engineering Science. 27(11). 2017–2028. 10 indexed citations
16.
O’Neill, M. E.. (1970). The resistance to steady parallel viscous flows produced by small-scale boundary irregularities. Chemical Engineering Science. 25(2). 283–291. 2 indexed citations
17.
O’Neill, M. E., et al.. (1969). On the slow motion generated in a viscous fluid by the approach of a sphere to a plane wall or stationary sphere. Mathematika. 16(1). 37–49. 147 indexed citations
18.
O’Neill, M. E.. (1968). A sphere in contact with a plane wall in a slow linear shear flow. Chemical Engineering Science. 23(11). 1293–1298. 487 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
O’Neill, M. E.. (1964). A Slow motion of viscous liquid caused by a slowly moving solid sphere. Mathematika. 11(1). 67–74. 223 indexed citations
20.
Dean, W. R. & M. E. O’Neill. (1963). A slow motion of viscous liquid caused by the rotation of a solid sphere. Mathematika. 10(1). 13–24. 170 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026