M. E. Huber

10.1k total citations
89 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

M. E. Huber is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. E. Huber has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Condensed Matter Physics, 46 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 28 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in M. E. Huber's work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (50 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (25 papers) and Superconducting and THz Device Technology (23 papers). M. E. Huber is often cited by papers focused on Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (50 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (25 papers) and Superconducting and THz Device Technology (23 papers). M. E. Huber collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and Germany. M. E. Huber's co-authors include Kathryn A. Moler, Nicholas C. Koshnick, Hendrik Bluhm, K. D. Irwin, John M. Martinis, Y. Myasoedov, E. Zeldov, Yonathan Anahory, Julie A. Bert and J. Cuppens and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

M. E. Huber

82 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. E. Huber United States 24 1.4k 1.3k 602 501 485 89 2.4k
Francesco Giazotto Italy 32 2.2k 1.5× 2.9k 2.2× 976 1.6× 628 1.3× 338 0.7× 150 3.8k
V. N. Antonov United Kingdom 21 812 0.6× 1.3k 1.0× 503 0.8× 175 0.3× 524 1.1× 119 2.1k
K. Ilin Germany 32 1.4k 1.0× 1.5k 1.1× 391 0.6× 734 1.5× 321 0.7× 137 3.0k
D. E. Prober United States 26 1.5k 1.0× 1.9k 1.5× 421 0.7× 967 1.9× 443 0.9× 133 3.5k
M. Meschke Finland 20 688 0.5× 1.0k 0.8× 326 0.5× 293 0.6× 148 0.3× 60 1.6k
J. J. A. Baselmans Netherlands 27 1.3k 0.9× 1.5k 1.1× 185 0.3× 1.4k 2.9× 211 0.4× 145 2.9k
Y. M. Galperin Norway 25 1.4k 1.0× 1.3k 1.0× 576 1.0× 81 0.2× 457 0.9× 136 2.5k
L. S. Kuzmin Sweden 28 980 0.7× 1.4k 1.1× 164 0.3× 747 1.5× 114 0.2× 169 2.2k
Tero T. Heikkilä Finland 34 1.8k 1.3× 3.7k 2.8× 1.3k 2.1× 394 0.8× 492 1.0× 120 4.6k
M. W. Wu China 28 766 0.5× 2.0k 1.6× 923 1.5× 390 0.8× 128 0.3× 105 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by M. E. Huber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. E. Huber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. E. Huber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. E. Huber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. E. Huber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. E. Huber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. E. Huber. The network helps show where M. E. Huber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. E. Huber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. E. Huber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. E. Huber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. E. Huber. M. E. Huber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Zur, Y., Sergei Remennik, Kenji Watanabe, et al.. (2025). Anomalous thickness dependence of the vortex pearl length in few-layer NbSe2. Nature Communications. 16(1). 2696–2696. 1 indexed citations
2.
Dutta, S. K., Alexander Y. Meltzer, Sameer Grover, et al.. (2025). Isospin magnetic texture and intervalley exchange interaction in rhombohedral tetralayer graphene. Nature Physics. 21(11). 1765–1772.
3.
Zur, Y., Edwin Herrera, M. E. Huber, et al.. (2024). Anomalous size dependence of the coercivity of nanopatterned CrGeTe3. Nanoscale. 16(41). 19504–19509. 2 indexed citations
4.
Park, Heonjoon, Jiaqi Cai, Eric Anderson, et al.. (2024). Direct magnetic imaging of fractional Chern insulators in twisted MoTe2. Nature. 635(8039). 584–589. 25 indexed citations
5.
Holder, Tobias, Arnab Pariari, Y. Myasoedov, et al.. (2024). Demonstration and imaging of cryogenic magneto-thermoelectric cooling in a van der Waals semimetal. Nature Physics. 20(6). 976–983. 8 indexed citations
6.
Roy, Indranil, Sameer Grover, Jiewen Xiao, et al.. (2024). De Haas–van Alphen spectroscopy and magnetic breakdown in moiré graphene. Science. 383(6678). 42–48. 6 indexed citations
7.
Arp, Trevor, Haoxin Zhou, Caitlin L. Patterson, et al.. (2024). Intervalley coherence and intrinsic spin–orbit coupling in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Nature Physics. 20(9). 1413–1420. 25 indexed citations
8.
Zhou, Haibiao, Indranil Roy, M. E. Huber, et al.. (2023). Scanning SQUID-on-tip microscope in a top-loading cryogen-free dilution refrigerator. Review of Scientific Instruments. 94(5). 5 indexed citations
9.
Zhou, Haibiao, M. E. Huber, Kenji Watanabe, et al.. (2023). Imaging quantum oscillations and millitesla pseudomagnetic fields in graphene. Nature. 624(7991). 275–281. 12 indexed citations
10.
Li, Lizhong, Tingxin Li, Shengwei Jiang, et al.. (2023). Intrinsic spin Hall torque in a moiré Chern magnet. Nature Physics. 19(6). 807–813. 20 indexed citations
11.
Zur, Y., Samuel Mañas‐Valero, M. E. Huber, et al.. (2023). Magnetic Imaging and Domain Nucleation in CrSBr Down to the 2D Limit. Advanced Materials. 35(47). e2307195–e2307195. 23 indexed citations
12.
Alpern, Hen, Hadar Steinberg, M. E. Huber, et al.. (2022). Tunable exchange bias in the magnetic Weyl semimetal Co3Sn2S2. Physical review. B.. 105(14). 16 indexed citations
13.
Fink, C. W., S. L. Watkins, T. Aramaki, et al.. (2020). Characterizing TES power noise for future single optical-phonon and infrared-photon detectors. AIP Advances. 10(8). 16 indexed citations
14.
Huber, M. E., et al.. (2019). Scanning SQUID microscopy in a cryogen-free cooler. Review of Scientific Instruments. 90(5). 53702–53702. 11 indexed citations
15.
Lachman, Ella, Masataka Mogi, Jayanta Sarkar, et al.. (2018). Observation of Superparamagnetism in Coexistence with Quantum Anomalous Hall C=±1 and C=0 Chern States. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2018. 1 indexed citations
16.
Lachman, Ella, Andrea F. Young, Anthony Richardella, et al.. (2015). Visualization of superparamagnetic dynamics in magnetic topological insulators. Science Advances. 1(10). e1500740–e1500740. 121 indexed citations
17.
Foroughi, F., Brannon B. Klopfer, Katja C. Nowack, et al.. (2014). High-sensitivity SQUIDs with dispersive readout for scanning microscopy. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2014. 2 indexed citations
18.
Vasyukov, Denis, Yonathan Anahory, Lior Embon, et al.. (2013). A scanning superconducting quantum interference device with single electron spin sensitivity. Nature Nanotechnology. 8(9). 639–644. 293 indexed citations
19.
Bluhm, Hendrik, Nicholas C. Koshnick, M. E. Huber, & Kathryn A. Moler. (2006). Magnetic Response of Mesoscopic Superconducting Rings with Two Order Parameters. Physical Review Letters. 97(23). 237002–237002. 81 indexed citations
20.
Angloher, G., M. E. Huber, J. Jochum, et al.. (2001). Effects of Quasiparticle Recombination and Photoelectron Escape in Al-Superconducting Tunnel Junction Detectors. Journal of Low Temperature Physics. 123(3-4). 165–180. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026