M. Daniel

6.6k total citations
10 papers, 253 citations indexed

About

M. Daniel is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Daniel has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 253 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1 paper in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 1 paper in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in M. Daniel's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (9 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers). M. Daniel is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (9 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (8 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers). M. Daniel collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and France. M. Daniel's co-authors include G.G. Ross, F. del Águila, G. A. Blair, S. Chadha, Qaisar Shafi, G. Lazarides, J. Peñarrocha, G.D. Coughlan, Andrew Evans and Rajkumar Vajpeyi and has published in prestigious journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Diagnostics.

In The Last Decade

M. Daniel

9 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Daniel United Kingdom	6	249	76	10	8	2	10	253
S. De Curtis Italy	8	225 0.9×	83 1.1×	11 1.1×	8 1.0×	4 2.0×	8	231
Sharada Iyer Dutta United States	8	311 1.2×	86 1.1×	12 1.2×	10 1.3×	1 0.5×	10	320
D. Schramm United States	5	142 0.6×	104 1.4×	13 1.3×	6 0.8×	1 0.5×	11	157
J. van der Bij United States	2	174 0.7×	36 0.5×	8 0.8×	7 0.9×		2	178
William J. Marciano United States	5	434 1.7×	48 0.6×	8 0.8×	14 1.8×	1 0.5×	10	441
Hideo Fusaoka Japan	7	336 1.3×	30 0.4×	12 1.2×	7 0.9×	1 0.5×	17	350
S. P. Mikheev Russia	6	328 1.3×	40 0.5×	5 0.5×	6 0.8×	1 0.5×	13	331
Stephen Kuhlmann United States	2	243 1.0×	40 0.5×	7 0.7×	5 0.6×	2 1.0×	5	264
H. Veltman United States	5	181 0.7×	34 0.4×	4 0.4×	8 1.0×	3 1.5×	8	183
M. V. Chizhov Russia	9	353 1.4×	74 1.0×	12 1.2×	18 2.3×	1 0.5×	35	356

Countries citing papers authored by M. Daniel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Daniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Daniel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Daniel. The network helps show where M. Daniel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Daniel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Daniel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Daniel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Daniel. M. Daniel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Daniel, M., Rajkumar Vajpeyi, Blaise Clarke, et al.. (2025). From Microscopes to Monitors: Unique Opportunities and Challenges in Digital Pathology Implementation in Remote Canadian Regions. Diagnostics. 15(16). 1983–1983.

2.

Águila, F. del, G. A. Blair, M. Daniel, & G.G. Ross. (1987). Analysis of neutral currents in superstring inspired models. Nuclear Physics B. 283. 50–72. 41 indexed citations

3.

Águila, F. del, G. A. Blair, M. Daniel, & G.G. Ross. (1986). Superstring-inspired models. Nuclear Physics B. 272(2). 413–438. 98 indexed citations

4.

Daniel, M. & J. Peñarrocha. (1984). SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1) next-to-leading corrections for proton decay in the SU(5) model. Nuclear Physics B. 236(2). 467–500. 4 indexed citations

5.

Chadha, S., G.D. Coughlan, M. Daniel, & G.G. Ross. (1984). Nucleon decay in supersymmetric models via gluino dressed graphs. Physics Letters B. 149(6). 477–481. 6 indexed citations

6.

Chadha, S. & M. Daniel. (1984). Chiral lagrangian calculation of nucleon branching ratios in the supersymmetric SU(5) model. Physics Letters B. 137(5-6). 374–378. 8 indexed citations

7.

Daniel, M. & J. Peñarrocha. (1983). Next to leading enhancement factor for proton decay in SU5. Physics Letters B. 127(3-4). 219–223. 4 indexed citations

8.

Chadha, S. & M. Daniel. (1983). Chiral lagrangian calculation of nucleon decay modes induced by d=5 supersymmetric operators. Nuclear Physics B. 229(1). 105–114. 41 indexed citations

9.

Daniel, M., G. Lazarides, & Qaisar Shafi. (1980). SU(5) monopoles, magnetic symmetry and confinement. Nuclear Physics B. 170(1). 156–164. 48 indexed citations

10.

Daniel, M.. (1976). The spinorial charges of supersymmetry and twisters. Physics Letters B. 65(3). 246–248. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact