M D Erisman
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Cancer Research
- Co-authors
- Susan M. AstrinPaul G. RothbergRonald E. DiehlJohn SpandorferL.H. LazarusR. Ilona LinnoilaC. C. MorseÓscar Hernández
- Topics
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers)T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesMolecular and Cellular BiologyBritish Journal of Cancer
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
M D Erisman
14 papers receiving 784 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Molecular Biology 435
- Oncology 388
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 226
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 115
- Cancer Research 107
Countries citing papers authored by M D Erisman
This map shows the geographic impact of M D Erisman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M D Erisman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M D Erisman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M D Erisman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M D Erisman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M D Erisman. The network helps show where M D Erisman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M D Erisman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M D Erisman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M D Erisman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M D Erisman. M D Erisman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | |
| 2 | Noncorrelation of the expression of the c-myc oncogene in colorectal carcinoma with recurrence of disease or patient survival. | 45 |
| 3 | Enhanced expression of the c-myc gene in bovine leukemia virus-induced bovine tumors. | 10 |
| 4 | 206 | |
| 5 | 71 | |
| 6 | 64 | |
| 7 | 118 | |
| 8 | 83 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 162 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 18 |
About M D Erisman
M D Erisman is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Oncology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 836 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (388 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (226 citations) and Cancer Research (107 citations). M D Erisman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Astrin, Paul G. Rothberg, Ronald E. Diehl, John Spandorfer, L.H. Lazarus, R. Ilona Linnoila, C. C. Morse, Óscar Hernández, Ugo Rovigatti and J. K. Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Molecular and Cellular Biology and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.