M. Choct

14.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
229 papers, 10.5k citations indexed

About

M. Choct is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Plant Science and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Choct has authored 229 papers receiving a total of 10.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 184 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 53 papers in Plant Science and 44 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in M. Choct's work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (180 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (58 papers) and Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (44 papers). M. Choct is often cited by papers focused on Animal Nutrition and Physiology (180 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (58 papers) and Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (44 papers). M. Choct collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Norway. M. Choct's co-authors include G. Annison, Paul Iji, Shu‐Biao Wu, B. Svihus, Robert A. Swick, A. Kocher, Yichao Yang, Robert Hughes, M.R. Bedford and H. Hetland and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Journal of Nutrition.

In The Last Decade

M. Choct

220 papers receiving 9.5k citations

Hit Papers

Increased small intestinal fermentation is partly respons... 1996 2026 2006 2016 1996 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Choct Australia 56 8.4k 2.9k 1.6k 1.6k 1.3k 229 10.5k
C. M. Nyachoti Canada 54 6.9k 0.8× 1.9k 0.7× 1.3k 0.8× 1.5k 1.0× 821 0.6× 283 9.4k
A.J. Cowieson Switzerland 48 7.3k 0.9× 3.3k 1.1× 1.1k 0.7× 754 0.5× 2.7k 2.1× 231 8.7k
V. Ravindran New Zealand 66 12.2k 1.5× 5.9k 2.0× 1.6k 1.0× 1.2k 0.7× 3.9k 3.1× 316 14.8k
O. Adeola United States 51 7.7k 0.9× 2.9k 1.0× 1.3k 0.8× 578 0.4× 2.3k 1.8× 344 9.2k
Jürgen Zentek Germany 46 3.7k 0.4× 1.9k 0.6× 1.6k 1.0× 1.9k 1.2× 306 0.2× 358 8.4k
Hans H Stein United States 45 6.4k 0.8× 1.5k 0.5× 1.4k 0.8× 1.1k 0.7× 667 0.5× 358 8.5k
Xiangshu Piao China 40 4.1k 0.5× 1.5k 0.5× 654 0.4× 1.3k 0.8× 446 0.3× 180 6.1k
R. Mosenthin Germany 42 3.5k 0.4× 991 0.3× 1.2k 0.7× 1.1k 0.7× 398 0.3× 198 6.1k
R. T. Zijlstra Canada 46 4.1k 0.5× 995 0.3× 1.3k 0.8× 979 0.6× 345 0.3× 220 6.2k
W. L. Bryden Australia 40 4.0k 0.5× 2.4k 0.8× 760 0.5× 697 0.4× 1.2k 0.9× 166 6.4k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Choct

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Choct's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Choct with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Choct more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Choct

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Choct. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Choct. The network helps show where M. Choct may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Choct

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Choct. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Choct based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Choct. M. Choct is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kumar, Alip, et al.. (2025). Potential of Bacillus subtilis PB6 in corn-based diets to combat subclinical necrotic enteritis in broilers. Poultry Science. 104(10). 105574–105574.
2.
Yan, Lei, Beibei Zhang, M. Choct, et al.. (2024). Effects of replacing soybean meal with cottonseed meal on growth performance, carcass trait, intestinal development and intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 104(2). 104653–104653. 1 indexed citations
3.
Morgan, Natalie K., et al.. (2019). In vitro versus in situ evaluation of xylan hydrolysis into xylo-oligosaccharides in broiler chicken gastrointestinal tract. Carbohydrate Polymers. 230. 115645–115645. 21 indexed citations
4.
Wu, Shu‐Biao, M. Choct, & G.M. Pesti. (2019). Historical flaws in bioassays used to generate metabolizable energy values for poultry feed formulation: a critical review. Poultry Science. 99(1). 385–406. 51 indexed citations
5.
Morgan, Natalie K., Andrew D. Wallace, M.R. Bedford, & M. Choct. (2017). Efficiency of xylanases from families 10 and 11 in production of xylo -oligosaccharides from wheat arabinoxylans. Carbohydrate Polymers. 167. 290–296. 44 indexed citations
6.
Kheravii, Sarbast K., Robert A. Swick, M. Choct, & Shu‐Biao Wu. (2017). Dietary sugarcane bagasse and coarse particle size of corn are beneficial to performance and gizzard development in broilers fed normal and high sodium diets. Poultry Science. 96(11). 4006–4016. 28 indexed citations
7.
Sharma, Nishchal K., M. Choct, Shu‐Biao Wu, & Robert A. Swick. (2017). Nutritional effects on odour emissions in broiler production. World s Poultry Science Journal. 73(2). 257–280. 21 indexed citations
8.
Wood, Jennifer A., et al.. (2014). Differences between easy- and difficult-to-mill chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) genotypes. Part II: Protein, lipid and mineral composition. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).
9.
Wood, Jennifer A., et al.. (2012). Milling Performance and Other Quality Traits Affected by Seed Shape in Isogenic Lines of Desi Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Agricultural Science. 4(10). 9 indexed citations
10.
Svihus, B., et al.. (2012). The effect of insoluble fiber and intermittent feeding on gizzard development, gut motility, and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 91(3). 693–700. 139 indexed citations
11.
12.
Bao, Yongming & M. Choct. (2010). Dietary NSP nutrition and intestinal immune system for broiler chickens. World s Poultry Science Journal. 66(3). 511–518. 34 indexed citations
13.
14.
Roberts, Juliet R. & M. Choct. (2006). Effects of commercial enzyme preparations on egg and eggshell quality in laying hens. British Poultry Science. 47(4). 501–510. 22 indexed citations
15.
Barneveld, R. J. van, et al.. (2005). Extrusion and expansion of cereal grains promotes variable energy yields in pigs, broiler chickens and laying hens. RUNE (Research UNE). 15(2005). 47–55. 1 indexed citations
16.
Choct, M., A. Kocher, Daniel Le Waters, Dan Pettersson, & Gilbert L. Ross. (2004). A comparison of three xylanases on the nutritive value of two wheats for broiler chickens. British Journal Of Nutrition. 92(1). 53–61. 131 indexed citations
17.
Choct, M., et al.. (2004). Selenium supplementation affects broiler growth performance, meat yield and feather coverage. British Poultry Science. 45(5). 677–683. 141 indexed citations
18.
Pethick, D.W., et al.. (2001). The use of exogenous feed enzymes in reducing the anti-nutritive effects on dietary fibre in dog foods. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 2 indexed citations
19.
Hughes, Robert, M. Choct, A. Kocher, & R. J. van Barneveld. (2000). Effect of food enzymes on AME and composition of digesta from broiler chickens fed on diets containing non-starch polysaccharides isolated from lupin kernel. British Poultry Science. 41(3). 318–323. 23 indexed citations
20.
Graham, H., M.R. Bedford, & M. Choct. (1993). High gut viscosity can reduce poultry performance.. Feedstuffs.. 65(6). 14–15. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026