M. C. Ip

413 total citations
14 papers, 349 citations indexed

About

M. C. Ip is a scholar working on Surgery, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, M. C. Ip has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 349 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in M. C. Ip's work include Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers). M. C. Ip is often cited by papers focused on Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (4 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (3 papers). M. C. Ip collaborates with scholars based in Hong Kong, United Kingdom and United States. M. C. Ip's co-authors include David J. Barker, Gerta Vrbovà, K. S. F. Chang, Gerta Vrbov�, D. R. Westbury, Yi‐Lee Wong, Norman Giesbrecht, Daniel T. Myran, Jarvis T. Chen and Vaughan W. Rees and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Physiology, American Journal of Public Health and Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

M. C. Ip

14 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

M. C. Ip
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 169
  • Molecular Biology 130
  • Biomedical Engineering 62
  • Cell Biology 57
  • Physiology 56
Replace M Swallow with:
M Swallow United Kingdom
C. Seifert Germany
Thomas Dorn Switzerland
Chelsey B. Reed United States
Sören Fex Sweden
Dae-In Jung South Korea
Reuben Johnson United Kingdom
Yuta Kajiyama Japan
Joseph M. Harrison United States
Karen Smith United States
M Swallow United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to M. C. Ip
M. C. Ip · 1×
Citations per year, relative to M. C. Ip
M. C. Ip · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by M. C. Ip

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. Ip's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. Ip with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. Ip more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. C. Ip

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. Ip. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. Ip. The network helps show where M. C. Ip may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. C. Ip

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. C. Ip. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. C. Ip based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. C. Ip. M. C. Ip is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 13
2 25
3
Practitioner Health Issues Featuring Before New Zealand’s Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal: An Analysis of Cases 2003-2014.
1
4
Name Suppression Practices of New Zealand’s Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal 2004-2014.
3
5 8
6 16
7 7
8 27
9 6
10 19
11 23
12 4
13 172
14 25

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026