Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production
2007818 citationsDinesh Mohan, Charles U. Pittman et al.Journal of Colloid and Interface Scienceprofile →
Electrokinetic remediation: Basics and technology status
1995536 citationsYalçin B. Acar, Robert J. Gale et al.Journal of Hazardous Materialsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M Bricka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Bricka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Bricka more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Bricka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Bricka. The network helps show where M Bricka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M Bricka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M Bricka.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M Bricka based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M Bricka. M Bricka is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Mohan, Dinesh, Charles U. Pittman, M Bricka, et al.. (2007). Sorption of arsenic, cadmium, and lead by chars produced from fast pyrolysis of wood and bark during bio-oil production. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 310(1). 57–73.818 indexed citations breakdown →
Alshawabkeh, Akram N., et al.. (1997). Effect of solubility on enhanced electrokinetic extraction of metals. 532–544.11 indexed citations
6.
Acar, Yalçin B., Robert J. Gale, Akram N. Alshawabkeh, et al.. (1995). Electrokinetic remediation: Basics and technology status. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 40(2). 117–137.536 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Bricka, M & M Bessis. (1955). [Preservation of erythrocytes by freezing in the presence of polyvinylpyrrolidone and dextran].. PubMed. 149(9-10). 875–7.4 indexed citations
Bessis, M, M Bricka, & J Breton-Gorius. (1953). [Different aspects of the surface of sickle-cell erythrocytes observed by electronic microscope].. PubMed. 8(2). 222–9.2 indexed citations
10.
Bessis, M, et al.. (1952). [Study of the myelogram with electron microscope by the replica method].. PubMed. 60(50). 1076–8.1 indexed citations
11.
Bessis, M, M Bricka, & J Breton-Gorius. (1952). [Examination of the surface of falciform erythrocytes under the electron microscope].. PubMed. 235(22). 1433–4.2 indexed citations
12.
Bessis, M, et al.. (1952). [New data on agglutination mechanism of erythrocytes; phase contrast microscopy and electron microscopy].. PubMed. 234(27). 2645–6.1 indexed citations
13.
Bessis, M & M Bricka. (1952). [Dynamic aspect of blood cells; study by phase contrast microcinematography].. PubMed. 7(3). 407–35.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.