Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Improving PARSEC models for very low mass stars
2014388 citationsL. Girardi, A. Bressan et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Barbieri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Barbieri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Barbieri more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Barbieri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Barbieri. The network helps show where M. Barbieri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Barbieri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Barbieri.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Barbieri based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Barbieri. M. Barbieri is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Girardi, L., M. Barbieri, S. Zaggia, et al.. (2021). Dissecting theGaiaHR diagram within 200 pc. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 506(4). 5681–5697.17 indexed citations
6.
Barbieri, M., et al.. (2020). Atacama region as a planetary analog for astrobiology. 100–100.1 indexed citations
7.
Zampieri, L., G. Naletto, C. Barbieri, et al.. (2019). (Very) Fast astronomical photometry for meter-class telescopes. Research Padua Archive (University of Padua). 49(2). 85–96.
8.
Zampieri, L., Michele Fiori, A. Burtovoi, et al.. (2018). Low-frequency optical QPO in MAXI J1820+070 detected with IFI+IQUEYE@Galileo. Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna). 11723. 1.1 indexed citations
9.
Molaro, P., L. Monaco, M. Barbieri, S. Zaggia, & C. Lovis. (2015). Simultaneous HARPS and HARPS-N Observations of the Earth Transit of 2014 as Seen from Jupiter: Detection of an Inverse Rossiter-McLaughlin Effect. Msngr. 161. 20–23.1 indexed citations
10.
Čadež, A., L. Zampieri, C. Barbieri, et al.. (2015). What brakes the Crab pulsar?. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 587. A99–A99.7 indexed citations
11.
Molaro, P., L. Monaco, M. Barbieri, & S. Zaggia. (2013). HARPS Observations of the 2012 Transit of Venus. The Messenger. 153. 22–24.1 indexed citations
Alonso, R., M. Barbieri, M. Rabus, et al.. (2008). Limits to the planet candidate GJ 436c. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 487(1). L5–L8.35 indexed citations
15.
Claudi, R., Mauro Cancian, M. Barbieri, G. Piotto, & Salvatore Scuderi. (2006). The RATS Stellar Fields. 9. 167.
Barbieri, M., et al.. (2001). Focus Earth: the Velingara circular structure - a meteorite impact crater?. 106. 135–139.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.