M. Alexis Kirk

3.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
14 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

M. Alexis Kirk is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Alexis Kirk has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in M. Alexis Kirk's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (10 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (6 papers) and Community Health and Development (6 papers). M. Alexis Kirk is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (10 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (6 papers) and Community Health and Development (6 papers). M. Alexis Kirk collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Qatar. M. Alexis Kirk's co-authors include Sarah A. Birken, Laura J. Damschroder, Caitlin Kelley, Nicholas Yankey, Brenton Abadie, Emily R. Haines, Byron J. Powell, Christopher M. Shea, Justin Presseau and Shannon Wiltsey Stirman and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Implementation Science and Journal of Palliative Medicine.

In The Last Decade

M. Alexis Kirk

14 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framew... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 2017 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Alexis Kirk United States 10 1.3k 323 238 127 122 14 1.8k
Brenton Abadie United States 2 1.0k 0.8× 235 0.7× 170 0.7× 99 0.8× 115 0.9× 2 1.4k
Marilla A. Opra Widerquist United States 5 1.1k 0.9× 423 1.3× 240 1.0× 166 1.3× 212 1.7× 7 2.0k
Lucio Naccarella Australia 19 1.2k 0.9× 252 0.8× 439 1.8× 83 0.7× 179 1.5× 100 1.7k
Shashi Balain United Kingdom 3 817 0.6× 215 0.7× 173 0.7× 155 1.2× 127 1.0× 4 1.6k
Caitlin N. Dorsey United States 13 1.2k 0.9× 356 1.1× 185 0.8× 163 1.3× 154 1.3× 25 2.0k
Candice Bowman United States 14 1.0k 0.8× 260 0.8× 195 0.8× 69 0.5× 308 2.5× 28 1.6k
Heather Halko United States 7 926 0.7× 325 1.0× 123 0.5× 149 1.2× 136 1.1× 11 1.7k
Jodi Summers Holtrop United States 24 970 0.8× 474 1.5× 156 0.7× 98 0.8× 260 2.1× 102 1.8k
Gwenndolyn C. Porter United States 12 859 0.7× 412 1.3× 159 0.7× 113 0.9× 171 1.4× 26 1.6k
Mark Pearson United Kingdom 24 802 0.6× 447 1.4× 141 0.6× 82 0.6× 144 1.2× 94 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Alexis Kirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Alexis Kirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Alexis Kirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Alexis Kirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Alexis Kirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Alexis Kirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Alexis Kirk. The network helps show where M. Alexis Kirk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Alexis Kirk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Alexis Kirk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Alexis Kirk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Alexis Kirk. M. Alexis Kirk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Haines, Emily R., M. Alexis Kirk, Andrew B. Smitherman, et al.. (2021). Ethnography and user-centered design to inform context-driven implementation. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 12(1). 10 indexed citations
2.
Kirk, M. Alexis, Julia E. Moore, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, & Sarah A. Birken. (2020). Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations’ impact: the model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implementation Science. 15(1). 56–56. 146 indexed citations
3.
Garner, Bryan R., Sheila V. Patel, & M. Alexis Kirk. (2020). Priority domains, aims, and testable hypotheses for implementation research: Protocol for a scoping review and evidence map. Systematic Reviews. 9(1). 277–277. 3 indexed citations
4.
Kirk, M. Alexis, Laura C. Hanson, Morris Weinberger, et al.. (2019). Pilot Test of an Adapted Intervention to Improve Timeliness of Referrals to Hospice and Palliative Care for Eligible Home Health Patients. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 22(10). 1266–1270. 7 indexed citations
5.
Kirk, M. Alexis. (2019). ADAPTATION OF AN EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTION (EBI) TO IMPROVE REFERRALS TO HOSPICE FOR HOME- AND COMMUNITY-BASED POPULATIONS. Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). 1 indexed citations
6.
Kirk, M. Alexis, Emily R. Haines, Franziska S. Rokoske, et al.. (2019). A case study of a theory-based method for identifying and reporting core functions and forms of evidence-based interventions. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 11(1). 21–33. 37 indexed citations
7.
Birken, Sarah A., Catherine L. Rohweder, Byron J. Powell, et al.. (2018). T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool. Implementation Science. 13(1). 143–143. 113 indexed citations
8.
Birken, Sarah A., Byron J. Powell, Justin Presseau, et al.. (2017). Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review. Implementation Science. 12(1). 2–2. 216 indexed citations
9.
Birken, Sarah A., Byron J. Powell, Christopher M. Shea, et al.. (2017). Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implementation Science. 12(1). 124–124. 255 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Birken, Sarah A., Alicia C. Bunger, Byron J. Powell, et al.. (2017). Organizational theory for dissemination and implementation research. Implementation Science. 12(1). 62–62. 76 indexed citations
11.
Zheng, Nan Tracy, Qinghua Li, Laura C. Hanson, et al.. (2017). Nationwide Quality of Hospice Care: Findings From the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospice Quality Reporting Program. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 55(2). 427–432.e1. 15 indexed citations
12.
Kirk, M. Alexis, Caitlin Kelley, Nicholas Yankey, et al.. (2015). A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation Science. 11(1). 72–72. 814 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Birken, Sarah A., et al.. (2015). Elaborating on theory with middle managers’ experience implementing healthcare innovations in practice. Implementation Science. 11(1). 2–2. 58 indexed citations
14.
Zheng, Nan Tracy, et al.. (2014). Hospices' Use of Electronic Medical Records for Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Programs. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 48(4). 582–589. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026