439 total citations 6 papers, 245 citations indexed
About
Lynge Nielsen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance.
According to data from OpenAlex, Lynge Nielsen has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 245 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 3 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Recurrent topics in Lynge Nielsen's work include Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers). Lynge Nielsen is often cited by papers focused on Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers). Lynge Nielsen collaborates with scholars based in United States. Lynge Nielsen's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Indicators Research, World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks and IMF Working Paper.
This map shows the geographic impact of Lynge Nielsen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynge Nielsen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynge Nielsen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynge Nielsen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynge Nielsen. The network helps show where Lynge Nielsen may publish in the future.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.