Lynette Scott

1.1k citations
17 papers · 759 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Lynette Scott

17 papers receiving 707 citations

Peers

Lynette Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Reproductive Medicine 445
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 434
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 617
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 40
  • Immunology 55
Replace C. Alvarez Sedó with:
C. Alvarez Sedó Argentina
C. Versaci United States
S. Antinori United States
Manuel Muñoz Spain
T. M. Breen Australia
Sharon R. Wiker United States
C.G. Vergouw Netherlands
K. Ivani United States
Cynthia Austin United States
Ioannis Sfontouris Greece
Lynette Scott relative to C. Alvarez Sedó Argentina C. Alvarez Sedó's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
C. Alvarez Sedó · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lynette Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lynette Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynette Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynette Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lynette Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynette Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynette Scott. The network helps show where Lynette Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Lynette Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lynette Scott Line = papers co-authored together Lynette Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2000323
2 2003123
3 2000109
4 199349
5 199530
6 200225
7 200223
8 199723
9
Endometrial biopsy dating. Interobserver variation and its impact on clinical practice.
199519
10 199518
11 19936
12 19964
13 20033
14 20101
15 20001
16 20061
17 20001

About Lynette Scott

Lynette Scott is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (12 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (5 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (4 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (2 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (445 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (434 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (617 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (40 citations) and Immunology (55 citations). Lynette Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Smith, James H. Segars, Bradley T Miller, Prabir K. Chakraborty, Eli Y. Adashi, Howard D. McClamrock, LS Magder, Laurence C. Udoff, David G. Whittingham and LaTasha B. Craig. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Human Reproduction and Human Fertility.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact