Lyn Redwood
About
In The Last Decade
Lyn Redwood
6 papers receiving 419 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 196
- Cognitive Neuroscience 172
- Nutrition and Dietetics 91
- Psychiatry and Mental health 87
- Genetics 68
Countries citing papers authored by Lyn Redwood
This map shows the geographic impact of Lyn Redwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lyn Redwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lyn Redwood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lyn Redwood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lyn Redwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lyn Redwood. The network helps show where Lyn Redwood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lyn Redwood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lyn Redwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lyn Redwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lyn Redwood. Lyn Redwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | Autism: A Unique Type of Mercury Poisoning | 11 |
| 4 | 93 | |
| 5 | 253 | |
| 6 | 42 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.