Luxia Chen

619 citations
30 papers · 474 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Luxia Chen

28 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers

Luxia Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Ophthalmology 94
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 227
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 142
  • Cancer Research 70
  • Immunology 68
Replace Elizabeth A. Stewart with:
Elizabeth A. Stewart United Kingdom
T J D'Orazio United States
Akira Kiritoshi Japan
Ute Schulze Germany
Justyna A. Karolak Poland
Valliammai Muthappan United States
Eva-Marie Chong United States
Víctor M. Villegas United States
Sylvia L Hargrave United States
Chieko Masuda Japan
Luxia Chen relative to Elizabeth A. Stewart United Kingdom Elizabeth A. Stewart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Elizabeth A. Stewart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luxia Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luxia Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luxia Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luxia Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luxia Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luxia Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luxia Chen. The network helps show where Luxia Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luxia Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luxia Chen Line = papers co-authored together Luxia Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202071
2 201164
3 201462
4 201546
5 201540
6 201731
7 200916
8 201416
9 202214
10 202012
11 202311
12 202311
13 202311
14 201510
15
Assessment of p16 expression and HPV infection in adenoid cystic carcinoma of the lacrimal gland.
201810
16 20118
17 20197
18 20247
19 20176
20 20205

About Luxia Chen

Luxia Chen is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Immunology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 474 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (10 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (7 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (7 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (3 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers) and Ocular Oncology and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (94 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (227 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (142 citations), Cancer Research (70 citations) and Immunology (68 citations). Luxia Chen has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sophie X. Deng, Sophie X. Deng, Fei Yu, Xiaorong Li, Lijie Dong, Wenbo Li, Fei Wang, Sheyla González, Jian Yu Rao and Yinjing Song. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Ophthalmology, Frontiers in Immunology, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, Tissue Engineering Part C Methods and Oncology Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact