Luther C. Kloth
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey A. FeedarJoseph McCullochGary D. GentzkowRamin Hamidi FarahaniChieu D. TranApril L. HarkinsPaula E. PapanekGeorg Daeschlein
- Topics
- Wound Healing and Treatments (21 papers)Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation (20 papers)Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandIran
In The Last Decade
Luther C. Kloth
46 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Rehabilitation 773
- Molecular Biology 716
- Biomedical Engineering 306
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 292
- Surgery 287
Countries citing papers authored by Luther C. Kloth
This map shows the geographic impact of Luther C. Kloth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luther C. Kloth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luther C. Kloth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luther C. Kloth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luther C. Kloth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luther C. Kloth. The network helps show where Luther C. Kloth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luther C. Kloth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luther C. Kloth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luther C. Kloth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luther C. Kloth. Luther C. Kloth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 161 | |
| 4 | 95 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | Adjunctive Interventions for Wound Healing | 6 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 58 | |
| 18 | 142 | |
| 19 | Wound healing : alternatives in management | 122 |
| 20 | 181 |
About Luther C. Kloth
Luther C. Kloth is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (21 papers), Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation (20 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (773 citations), Occupational Therapy (201 citations) and Dermatology (130 citations). Luther C. Kloth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey A. Feedar, Joseph McCulloch, Gary D. Gentzkow, Ramin Hamidi Farahani, Chieu D. Tran, April L. Harkins, Paula E. Papanek, Georg Daeschlein, Sheldon V. Pollack and Ojan Assadian. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Physical Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.