Luke Stikeleather
About
In The Last Decade
Luke Stikeleather
2 papers receiving 119 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Surgery 114
- Biomedical Engineering 28
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 28
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 20
- Genetics 7
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Stikeleather
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Stikeleather's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Stikeleather with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Stikeleather more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Stikeleather
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Stikeleather. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Stikeleather. The network helps show where Luke Stikeleather may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Stikeleather
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Stikeleather. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Stikeleather based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Stikeleather. Luke Stikeleather is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 98 | |
| 2 | Bracing for scoliosis in 2014: state of the art. | 26 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.