Luke Sox
About
In The Last Decade
Luke Sox
12 papers receiving 280 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- General Health Professions 126
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 71
- Family Practice 63
- Transplantation 62
- Applied Psychology 51
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Sox
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Sox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Sox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Sox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Sox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Sox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Sox. The network helps show where Luke Sox may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Sox
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Sox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Sox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Sox. Luke Sox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 90 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 48 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.