Luke Farrow
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 10%
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Blood transfusion and management
Papers in
- Surgery 27
- Hip and Femur Fractures 14
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 7
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 4
- Hip disorders and treatments 3
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 3
- Co-authors
- Phyo Kyaw Myint (7 shared papers)G Ashcroft (8 shared papers)Andrew Hall (7 shared papers)Toby O. Smith (2 shared papers)Alasdair M. J. MacLullich (7 shared papers)Scott Barker (2 shared papers)Nick D. Clement (6 shared papers)Andrew D. Duckworth (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Bone & Joint Journal (11 papers)Bone & Joint Open (4 papers)Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (3 papers)Musculoskeletal Care (3 papers)The Knee (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Luke Farrow
45 papers receiving 586 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Health Informatics 19
- Biochemistry 64
- Surgery 287
- Emergency Medicine 43
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 18
Countries citing papers authored by Luke Farrow
This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Farrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Farrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Farrow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Farrow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Farrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Farrow. The network helps show where Luke Farrow may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke Farrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 11 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 8 |
About Luke Farrow
Luke Farrow is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Health Informatics, Epidemiology and Rehabilitation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hip and Femur Fractures (14 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (7 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (4 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (4 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (3 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Public Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (19 citations), Biochemistry (64 citations), Surgery (287 citations), Emergency Medicine (43 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (18 citations). Luke Farrow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Phyo Kyaw Myint, G Ashcroft, Andrew Hall, Toby O. Smith, Alasdair M. J. MacLullich, Scott Barker, Nick D. Clement, Andrew D. Duckworth, Timothy O. White and G Dall. Their work appears in journals such as The Bone & Joint Journal, Bone & Joint Open, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal Care and The Knee.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.