Lukáš Jendele

567 citations
6 papers · 326 · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Lukáš Jendele

6 papers receiving 321 citations

Lukáš Jendele's Hit Papers

PrankWeb: a web server for ligand binding site prediction and visualization 2019 · 276 citations
2760+2+4Years since publication50100150200250

Peers

Lukáš Jendele
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 107
  • Health Informatics 6
  • Toxicology 10
  • Molecular Biology 162
  • Horticulture 2
Replace Wenxuan Wang with:
Wenxuan Wang China
Jingyu Lee South Korea
Giulia Chemi Italy
Ahmad Alzamami Saudi Arabia
Itunuoluwa Isewon Nigeria
Tiago Alves de Oliveira Brazil
Valmik Desai United States
Saw Simeon Thailand
Vidya Niranjan India
Mengying Sun China
Lukáš Jendele relative to Wenxuan Wang China Wenxuan Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×
Wenxuan Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lukáš Jendele

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lukáš Jendele's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lukáš Jendele with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lukáš Jendele more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lukáš Jendele

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lukáš Jendele. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lukáš Jendele. The network helps show where Lukáš Jendele may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Lukáš Jendele, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lukáš Jendele Line = papers co-authored together Lukáš Jendele links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown

About Lukáš Jendele

Lukáš Jendele is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 6 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (2 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (1 paper), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (1 paper), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (1 paper) and Speech and dialogue systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (107 citations), Health Informatics (6 citations), Toxicology (10 citations), Molecular Biology (162 citations) and Horticulture (2 citations). Lukáš Jendele has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Hoksza, Radoslav Krivák, Petr Škoda, Marián Novotný, Magda Marcon, Soleen Ghafoor, Anton S. Becker, Otmar Hilliges, Nicole Berger and Ender Konukoğlu. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, European Journal of Radiology, Nucleic Acids Research and Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact