Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A practical guide to multi-objective reinforcement learning and planning
2022158 citationsConor F. Hayes, Roxana Rădulescu et al.Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha)profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Luisa Zintgraf
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Luisa Zintgraf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luisa Zintgraf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luisa Zintgraf more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luisa Zintgraf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luisa Zintgraf. The network helps show where Luisa Zintgraf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luisa Zintgraf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luisa Zintgraf.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luisa Zintgraf based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luisa Zintgraf. Luisa Zintgraf is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hayes, Conor F., Roxana Rădulescu, Eugenio Bargiacchi, et al.. (2022). A practical guide to multi-objective reinforcement learning and planning. Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha).158 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Zintgraf, Luisa, et al.. (2021). VariBAD: Variational Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 22(289). 1–39.9 indexed citations
Zintgraf, Luisa, et al.. (2020). VariBAD: A Very Good Method for Bayes-Adaptive Deep RL via Meta-Learning. arXiv (Cornell University).9 indexed citations
8.
Roijers, Diederik M., Luisa Zintgraf, Pieter Libin, & Ann Nowé. (2020). Interactive multi-objective reinforcement learning in multi-armed bandits for any utility function. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).6 indexed citations
9.
Zintgraf, Luisa, et al.. (2018). CAML: Fast Context Adaptation via Meta-Learning..8 indexed citations
10.
Vamplew, Peter, et al.. (2017). MORL-Glue: a benchmark suite for multi-objective reinforcement learning. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).5 indexed citations
11.
Zintgraf, Luisa, Taco Cohen, Tameem Adel, & Max Welling. (2017). Visualizing Deep Neural Network Decisions: Prediction Difference Analysis. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).43 indexed citations
Zintgraf, Luisa, et al.. (2017). MultiMAuS: A Multi-Modal Authentication Simulator for Fraud Detection Research. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 360–369.1 indexed citations
14.
Zintgraf, Luisa, et al.. (2015). Quality Assessment of MORL Algorithms: A Utility-Based Approach.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.