Luis Paixão
About
In The Last Decade
Luis Paixão
10 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cognitive Neuroscience 152
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
- Psychiatry and Mental health 54
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 41
- Physiology 37
Countries citing papers authored by Luis Paixão
This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Paixão's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Paixão with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Paixão more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Paixão
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Paixão. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Paixão. The network helps show where Luis Paixão may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luis Paixão
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luis Paixão. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luis Paixão based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luis Paixão. Luis Paixão is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 88 | |
| 11 | 60 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.