Luis Mata

2.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
43 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Luis Mata is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Luis Mata has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 12 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 11 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Luis Mata's work include Urban Green Space and Health (11 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (8 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers). Luis Mata is often cited by papers focused on Urban Green Space and Health (11 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (8 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers). Luis Mata collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Spain. Luis Mata's co-authors include Nicholas S. G. Williams, Amy K. Hahs, Caragh G. Threlfall, Taikan Oki, Petra Döll, Blanca Jiménez, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz, Kathleen A. Miller, Nigel W. Arnell and Zekâi̇ Şen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Science of The Total Environment and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Luis Mata

39 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

The implications of projected climate change for freshwat... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Luis Mata Australia 16 873 477 445 363 308 43 1.8k
Mauricio Aguayo Chile 23 970 1.1× 258 0.5× 222 0.5× 160 0.4× 497 1.6× 57 1.8k
Peder Klith Bøcher Denmark 26 883 1.0× 113 0.2× 194 0.4× 266 0.7× 702 2.3× 44 2.1k
Nicola Clerici Colombia 23 1.1k 1.3× 190 0.4× 262 0.6× 104 0.3× 781 2.5× 52 2.1k
Matthew G. E. Mitchell Canada 20 1.8k 2.0× 92 0.2× 563 1.3× 292 0.8× 617 2.0× 38 2.5k
Joel W. Snodgrass United States 32 1.1k 1.3× 285 0.6× 1.0k 2.3× 190 0.5× 1.6k 5.1× 81 3.2k
Guoyin Wang China 15 1.9k 2.2× 287 0.6× 180 0.4× 335 0.9× 534 1.7× 21 3.1k
Christopher R. Pyke United States 20 917 1.1× 213 0.4× 116 0.3× 199 0.5× 642 2.1× 33 2.0k
Pua Bar Israel 32 1.1k 1.3× 98 0.2× 243 0.5× 331 0.9× 760 2.5× 73 2.6k
Alessandro Filazzola Canada 21 345 0.4× 131 0.3× 129 0.3× 338 0.9× 494 1.6× 58 1.5k
Roger Rodrigues Torres Brazil 22 1.1k 1.3× 359 0.8× 106 0.2× 239 0.7× 339 1.1× 51 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Luis Mata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Mata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Mata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Mata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luis Mata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Mata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Mata. The network helps show where Luis Mata may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luis Mata

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luis Mata. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luis Mata based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luis Mata. Luis Mata is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Logan, D.P., et al.. (2025). Fluffy bums and their aliens: Passionvine hoppers (Scolypopa australis (Walker)) and their elusive parasitoid wasps. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 115(3). 275–286.
2.
Slavenko, Alex, Perran A. Ross, Luis Mata, Ary A. Hoffmann, & Paul A. Umina. (2024). Modelling the spread of a novel endosymbiont infection in field populations of an aphid pest. Ecological Modelling. 497. 110851–110851. 4 indexed citations
3.
Mata, Luis, et al.. (2024). Acute toxicity effects of pesticides on predatory snout mites (Trombidiformes: Bdellidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 117(3). 951–962. 3 indexed citations
4.
Mata, Luis, et al.. (2024). Acute toxicity effects of pesticides on beneficial organisms – Dispelling myths for a more sustainable use of chemicals in agricultural environments. The Science of The Total Environment. 930. 172521–172521. 10 indexed citations
5.
McDougall, Robert, et al.. (2024). Assessing the sub‐lethal impacts of insecticides on aphid parasitoids through laboratory‐based studies. Austral Entomology. 63(1). 119–129. 6 indexed citations
6.
Soanes, Kylie, Lucy Taylor, Cristina E. Ramalho, et al.. (2023). Conserving urban biodiversity: Current practice, barriers, and enablers. Conservation Letters. 16(3). 25 indexed citations
7.
Mata, Luis, et al.. (2023). Large positive ecological changes of small urban greening actions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(3). 8 indexed citations
8.
Kotze, D. Johan, Elizabeth Lowe, J. Scott MacIvor, et al.. (2022). Urban forest invertebrates: how they shape and respond to the urban environment. Urban Ecosystems. 25(6). 1589–1609. 46 indexed citations
9.
Andrew, Nigel R., Maldwyn J. Evans, Lauren N. Svejcar, et al.. (2021). What's hot and what's not – Identifying publication trends in insect ecology. Austral Ecology. 47(1). 5–16. 14 indexed citations
11.
Valentine, Leonie E., Cristina E. Ramalho, Luis Mata, et al.. (2020). Novel resources: opportunities for and risks to species conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 18(10). 558–566. 16 indexed citations
12.
Kirk, Holly, Caragh G. Threlfall, Kylie Soanes, et al.. (2018). Improving connectivity for biodiversity across the City of Melbourne: a framework for evaluating and planning management actions.
13.
Mumaw, Laura, Sarah Bekessy, Brian Coffey, et al.. (2017). Why Politics and Context Matter in Conservation Policy. Global Policy. 8(2). 253–256. 11 indexed citations
14.
Mata, Luis, Caragh G. Threlfall, Nicholas S. G. Williams, et al.. (2017). Conserving herbivorous and predatory insects in urban green spaces. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 40970–40970. 59 indexed citations
15.
Mata, Luis, Marta Goula, & Amy K. Hahs. (2014). Conserving insect assemblages in urban landscapes: accounting for species-specific responses and imperfect detection. Journal of Insect Conservation. 18(5). 885–894. 21 indexed citations
16.
Mata, Luis & Marta Goula. (2011). Clave de Familias de Heterópteros de la Península Ibérica (Insecta, Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona).
17.
Goula, Marta & Luis Mata. (2011). Orthotylus (Parapachylops) caprai Wagner, 1955, new record for Iberian Peninsula (Heteroptera, Miridae). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France. 116(2). 177–179. 1 indexed citations
18.
Serrat‐Capdevila, Aleix, et al.. (2007). Modeling climate change impacts – and uncertainty – on the hydrology of a riparian system: The San Pedro Basin (Arizona/Sonora). Journal of Hydrology. 347(1-2). 48–66. 121 indexed citations
19.
Valdés, Juan B., et al.. (2005). Climate variability and climate change in Patagonian rivers. IAHS-AISH publication. 26–34. 4 indexed citations
20.
Mata, Luis, et al.. (2004). Las mujeres ignoradas de la psicología. 21(2). 101–132.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026