Citations per year, relative to Luis Maia Luis Maia (= 1×)
peers
O. Shadura
Countries citing papers authored by Luis Maia
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Luis Maia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luis Maia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luis Maia more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luis Maia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luis Maia. The network helps show where Luis Maia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luis Maia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luis Maia.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luis Maia based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Luis Maia. Luis Maia is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hauf, Steffen, Djelloul Boukhelef, M. Kuster, et al.. (2014). Calibration and Calibration Data Processing Concepts at the European XFEL. DESY (CERN, DESY, Fermilab, IHEP, and SLAC).1 indexed citations
3.
Boukhelef, Djelloul, et al.. (2013). Karabo: An Integrated Software Framework Combining Control, Data Management, and Scientific Computing Tasks. DESY (CERN, DESY, Fermilab, IHEP, and SLAC).13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.