Ludwig Danzer
Impact in
-
- Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
Papers in
-
- History and Theory of Mathematics 3
- Co-authors
- Egon SchulteBranko GrünbaumDetlef LaugwitzHanfried LenzVictor KleeZ. PapadopolosА. Л. ТалисMichel Weber
- Journals
- Discrete Mathematics (2 papers)Geometriae Dedicata (1 paper)Discrete & Computational Geometry (1 paper)Mathematische Zeitschrift (1 paper)COMBINATORICA (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ludwig Danzer
16 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 92
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 56
- Geometry and Topology 95
- Applied Mathematics 84
- Theoretical Computer Science 7
Countries citing papers authored by Ludwig Danzer
This map shows the geographic impact of Ludwig Danzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ludwig Danzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ludwig Danzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ludwig Danzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ludwig Danzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ludwig Danzer. The network helps show where Ludwig Danzer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Ludwig Danzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 35 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 8 | |
| 3 | 1993 | 20 | |
| 4 | 1989 | 47 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 33 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 27 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1982 | 39 | |
| 12 | 1967 | 21 | |
| 13 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1962 | 50 | |
| 15 | 1960 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1957 | 23 | |
| 17 | 1957 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1957 | 46 |
About Ludwig Danzer
Ludwig Danzer is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Geochemistry and Petrology and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quasicrystal Structures and Properties (5 papers), Mathematics and Applications (4 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (3 papers), Cellular Automata and Applications (3 papers), DNA and Biological Computing (2 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (2 papers), Mineralogy and Gemology Studies (2 papers) and Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (92 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (56 citations), Geometry and Topology (95 citations), Applied Mathematics (84 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations). Ludwig Danzer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Egon Schulte, Branko Grünbaum, Detlef Laugwitz, Hanfried Lenz, Victor Klee, Z. Papadopolos, А. Л. Талис, Michel Weber, G. C. Shephard and Ch. Pommerenke. Their work appears in journals such as Discrete Mathematics, Geometriae Dedicata, Discrete & Computational Geometry, Mathematische Zeitschrift and COMBINATORICA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.