Ludo Vanopdenbosch
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 5%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Co-authors
- Melissa CambronMiguel D’haeseleerJacques De KeyserStefaan J. VandecasteeleLudo Van Den BoschWim RobberechtRudy Van CosterJohan R. Boelaert
- Topics
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (16 papers)Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (6 papers)Polyomavirus and related diseases (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeurologyClinical Infectious Diseases
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Ludo Vanopdenbosch
44 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 450
- Neurology 388
- Molecular Biology 246
- Neurology 156
- Infectious Diseases 152
Countries citing papers authored by Ludo Vanopdenbosch
This map shows the geographic impact of Ludo Vanopdenbosch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ludo Vanopdenbosch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ludo Vanopdenbosch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ludo Vanopdenbosch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ludo Vanopdenbosch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ludo Vanopdenbosch. The network helps show where Ludo Vanopdenbosch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ludo Vanopdenbosch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ludo Vanopdenbosch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ludo Vanopdenbosch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ludo Vanopdenbosch. Ludo Vanopdenbosch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 185 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 65 | |
| 17 | 216 | |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Ludo Vanopdenbosch
Ludo Vanopdenbosch is a scholar working on Microbiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (16 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (6 papers) and Polyomavirus and related diseases (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (388 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (450 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (100 citations). Ludo Vanopdenbosch has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Melissa Cambron, Miguel D’haeseleer, Jacques De Keyser, Stefaan J. Vandecasteele, Ludo Van Den Bosch, Wim Robberecht, Rudy Van Coster, Johan R. Boelaert, An S. De Vriese and A. M. Lovering. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Neurology and Clinical Infectious Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.