Lucrezia Caon
About
In The Last Decade
Lucrezia Caon
5 papers receiving 304 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Global and Planetary Change 185
- Soil Science 139
- Ecology 96
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 48
- Plant Science 44
Countries citing papers authored by Lucrezia Caon
This map shows the geographic impact of Lucrezia Caon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucrezia Caon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucrezia Caon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lucrezia Caon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucrezia Caon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucrezia Caon. The network helps show where Lucrezia Caon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lucrezia Caon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lucrezia Caon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lucrezia Caon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lucrezia Caon. Lucrezia Caon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | Promoting sustainable soil management in Sub-Saharan Africa through the African soil partnership. | 1 |
| 4 | 97 | |
| 5 | 197 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.