540 total citations 11 papers, 101 citations indexed
About
Luca Pacioli is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science and Classics.
According to data from OpenAlex, Luca Pacioli has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 101 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1 paper in History and Philosophy of Science and 1 paper in Classics. Recurrent topics in Luca Pacioli's work include Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper), Architecture and Art History Studies (1 paper) and History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper). Luca Pacioli is often cited by papers focused on Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper), Architecture and Art History Studies (1 paper) and History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper). Luca Pacioli collaborates with scholars based in . Luca Pacioli's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology, Readex Microprint eBooks and Galiciana (Xunta de Galicia).
In The Last Decade
Luca Pacioli
10 papers
receiving
71 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Luca Pacioli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luca Pacioli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luca Pacioli more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luca Pacioli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luca Pacioli. The network helps show where Luca Pacioli may publish in the future.
No nodes
All Works
11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Pacioli, Luca, et al.. (2010). Ancient double-entry bookkeeping. : Lucas Pacioli's treatise (A. D. 1494--the earliest known writer on bookkeeping) reproduced and translated with reproductions, notes and abstracts from Manzoni, Pietra, Mainardi, Ympyn, Stevin and Dafforne. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).6 indexed citations
2.
Pacioli, Luca, et al.. (2009). Trattato De'Computi E Delle Scritture. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
3.
Pacioli, Luca. (2009). De las cuentas y las escrituras. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).5 indexed citations
4.
Pacioli, Luca, et al.. (1997). De viribus quantitatis. Medical Entomology and Zoology.11 indexed citations
5.
Pacioli, Luca, et al.. (1996). Ancient double-entry bookkeeping.28 indexed citations
6.
Pacioli, Luca, et al.. (1995). Libellus de quinque corporibus regularibus. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
7.
Pacioli, Luca. (1991). La Divina proporción. Galiciana (Xunta de Galicia).3 indexed citations
8.
Pacioli, Luca. (1973). Divina proportione : opera a tutti glingegni perspicaci e curiosi necessaria oue ciascun studioso di philosophia: prospectiua pictura sculptura: architectura: musica: e altre mathematice: suauissima: sottile: e admirabile doctrina consequira: e delecterassi cõ varie questione de secretissima scientia. Readex Microprint eBooks.3 indexed citations
9.
Pacioli, Luca, et al.. (1973). De divina proportione.35 indexed citations
10.
Pacioli, Luca, et al.. (1966). Double-entry book-keeping. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
11.
Pacioli, Luca, et al.. (1959). Summa de arithmetica, geometria, proportioni e proportionalità : Distinctio IX-Tractatus XI (tractatus de computis et scripturis). Medical Entomology and Zoology.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.