Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans
About
In The Last Decade
Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans
10 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Oncology 192
- Cancer Research 176
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 106
- Surgery 69
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 52
Countries citing papers authored by Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans
This map shows the geographic impact of Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans. The network helps show where Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans. Luc J.E.E. Scheijmans is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.