Louise Thwaites
- Endocrinology top 1%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lam Minh YenCharles R. NewtonNicholas J. BeechingGuy ThwaitesNguyễn Văn HảoNguyễn Văn Vĩnh ChâuJeremy FarrarNicholas J. White
- Topics
- Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (23 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (10 papers)Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- VietnamUnited KingdomThailand
In The Last Decade
Louise Thwaites
70 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Endocrinology 433
- Epidemiology 297
- Infectious Diseases 203
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 193
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 188
Countries citing papers authored by Louise Thwaites
This map shows the geographic impact of Louise Thwaites's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise Thwaites with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise Thwaites more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louise Thwaites
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise Thwaites. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise Thwaites. The network helps show where Louise Thwaites may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louise Thwaites
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louise Thwaites. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louise Thwaites based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louise Thwaites. Louise Thwaites is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 146 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Louise Thwaites
Louise Thwaites is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Health Informatics and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus (23 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (10 papers) and Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (433 citations), Health Informatics (35 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (49 citations). Louise Thwaites has collaborated with scholars based in Vietnam, United Kingdom and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Lam Minh Yen, Charles R. Newton, Nicholas J. Beeching, Guy Thwaites, Nguyễn Văn Hảo, Nguyễn Văn Vĩnh Châu, Jeremy Farrar, Nicholas J. White, Tingting Zhu and Le Van Tan. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.