Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Evolution and diversity of subduction zones controlled by slab width
2007499 citationsD. R. Stegman, Louis Moresi et al.profile →
Numerical investigation of 2D convection with extremely large viscosity variations
1995408 citationsLouis Moresi, V. S. Solomatovprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Louis Moresi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis Moresi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis Moresi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis Moresi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis Moresi. The network helps show where Louis Moresi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis Moresi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis Moresi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis Moresi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Louis Moresi. Louis Moresi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Yang, Haimeng, Louis Moresi, & Mark Quigley. (2019). Fault spacing in continental strike-slip shear zones: Southern California, New Zealand, and Central Tibet. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2019.1 indexed citations
Jadamec, M. A., et al.. (2011). Slab edge interaction with a back-arc spreading center: 3D instantaneous mantle flow models of Vanuatu, SW Pacific. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2011.1 indexed citations
13.
Quenette, Steve & Louis Moresi. (2010). Models based experimentation: numerical modelling of 3D basin scale architecture heat & fluid flow. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2010.4 indexed citations
14.
Cooper, C. M., A. Lenardic, A. Levander, & Louis Moresi. (2005). Craton Formation Via Thrust Stacking: Constraints on Proto-Cratonic Lithosphere From Geodynamics, Seismology, and Geochemistry. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2005.1 indexed citations
15.
Stegman, D. R., et al.. (2004). gLucifer: Next-generation visualization framework. AGUFM. 2004.1 indexed citations
16.
Cooper, C. M., A. Lenardic, & Louis Moresi. (2003). Stability of a Chemical Boundary Layer Within a Convecting Mantle. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2003.
17.
Lenardic, A. & Louis Moresi. (2002). The Longevity and Stability of Cratonic Lithosphere: Insights From Numerical Simulations of Coupled Mantle Convection and Continental Tectonics. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 2002.1 indexed citations
Solomatov, V. S., et al.. (2000). The Timing of Formation of Beta Regio and Its Geodynamical Implications. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1942.1 indexed citations
20.
Moresi, Louis. (1993). Effective elastic thickness of the Venusian lithosphere with lateral viscosity variations in the mantle. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1009.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.