Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Angiogenesis Assays: A Critical Overview
2003567 citationsRobert Auerbach, Rachel L. Lewis et al.Clinical Chemistryprofile →
A simple procedure for the long-term cultivation of chicken embryos
1974378 citationsRobert Auerbach, Louis Kubai et al.Developmental Biologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Louis Kubai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis Kubai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis Kubai more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis Kubai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis Kubai. The network helps show where Louis Kubai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis Kubai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis Kubai.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis Kubai based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Louis Kubai. Louis Kubai is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Auerbach, Robert, et al.. (2003). Angiogenesis Assays: A Critical Overview. Clinical Chemistry. 49(1). 32–40.567 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Muthukkaruppan, Vr., et al.. (1993). A ribonuclease inhibitor expresses anti-angiogenic properties and leads to reduced tumor growth in mice.. PubMed. 143(2). 507–17.37 indexed citations
Huang, Hua, et al.. (1992). An immune model of beryllium-induced pulmonary granulomata in mice. Histopathology, immune reactivity, and flow-cytometric analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage-derived cells.. PubMed. 67(1). 138–46.23 indexed citations
Muthukkaruppan, Vr., Louis Kubai, & R. Auerbach. (1982). Tumor-induced neovascularization in the mouse eye.. PubMed. 69(3). 699–708.122 indexed citations
Kubai, Louis, et al.. (1976). Studies on the maturation of immune responsiveness in the mouse. II. Role of the spleen.. PubMed. 117(1). 151–4.5 indexed citations
13.
Auerbach, Robert, Louis Kubai, & Younan A. Sidky. (1976). Angiogenesis induction by tumors, embryonic tissues, and lymphocytes.. PubMed. 36(9 PT 2). 3435–40.110 indexed citations
Chakravarty, A. K., Louis Kubai, Younan A. Sidky, & R. Auerbach. (1975). ONTOGENY OF THYMUS CELL FUNCTION*. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 249(1). 34–42.18 indexed citations
Auerbach, Robert, Louis Kubai, David R. Knighton, & Judah Folkman. (1974). A simple procedure for the long-term cultivation of chicken embryos. Developmental Biology. 41(2). 391–394.378 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.