Lot M. Geels
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Genetics
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Dorret I. BoomsmaMeike BartelsGonneke WillemsenJenny H. D. A. van BeekJacqueline M. VinkMarleen H. M. de MoorBirte Prahl‐AndersenConor V. Dolan
- Topics
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers)Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers)Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Lot M. Geels
21 papers receiving 694 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Clinical Psychology 232
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 152
- Psychiatry and Mental health 151
- Genetics 134
- Epidemiology 118
Countries citing papers authored by Lot M. Geels
This map shows the geographic impact of Lot M. Geels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lot M. Geels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lot M. Geels more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lot M. Geels
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lot M. Geels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lot M. Geels. The network helps show where Lot M. Geels may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lot M. Geels
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lot M. Geels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lot M. Geels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lot M. Geels. Lot M. Geels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 42 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 138 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 60 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | Genetic factors in alcoholic beverage preference in Dutch twins | 1 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 100 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About Lot M. Geels
Lot M. Geels is a scholar working on Periodontics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Periodontics (66 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (152 citations) and Clinical Psychology (232 citations). Lot M. Geels has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Dorret I. Boomsma, Meike Bartels, Gonneke Willemsen, Jenny H. D. A. van Beek, Jacqueline M. Vink, Marleen H. M. de Moor, Birte Prahl‐Andersen, Conor V. Dolan, Kenneth S. Kendler and Eco J. C. de Geus. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.