Lorie Eshima

573 citations
9 papers · 467 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Lorie Eshima

9 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Lorie Eshima
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Cancer Research 148
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 123
  • Oncology 160
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 127
  • Dermatology 40
Replace Roman Makarewicz with:
Roman Makarewicz Poland
Lori Christman United States
Jeffrey T. Lenert United States
Amy N. Melsaether United States
Laurent Martin France
David Chung Australia
L. Diggles United States
Glenda Y. Ross United States
Jennifer L. Wike United States
A. Fernandes United States
Lorie Eshima relative to Roman Makarewicz Poland Roman Makarewicz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Roman Makarewicz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lorie Eshima

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lorie Eshima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lorie Eshima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lorie Eshima more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lorie Eshima

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lorie Eshima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lorie Eshima. The network helps show where Lorie Eshima may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lorie Eshima, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lorie Eshima Line = papers co-authored together Lorie Eshima links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1997161
2 200068
3 199853
4
Fluorine-18-FPCT: a PET radiotracer for imaging dopamine transporters.
199751
5 199744
6
Technetium-99m-sulfur colloid for lymphoscintigraphy: effects of preparation parameters.
199639
7
Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of the dopamine transporter ligand.
200122
8
Effect of protein binding on renal extraction of 131I-OIH and 99mTc-labeled tubular agents.
200018
9 200011

About Lorie Eshima

Lorie Eshima is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology and Neurology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 467 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (2 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Lymphatic System and Diseases (1 paper) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (148 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (123 citations), Oncology (160 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (127 citations) and Dermatology (40 citations). Lorie Eshima has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Dennis Eshima, Naomi P. Alazraki, Andrew Taylor, Douglas R. Murray, Johnathan P. Vansant, John R. Thornback, Raghuveer Halkar, Clinton D. Kilts, Eugene Malveaux and John R. Votaw. Their work appears in journals such as Seminars in Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Biology and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact