Loretto Lacey

36 papers receiving 767 citations

Peers

Loretto Lacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 124
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 429
  • General Health Professions 282
  • Health 89
  • Economics and Econometrics 260
Replace Marisa Silvana Zazzetta with:
Marisa Silvana Zazzetta Brazil
Carla J.M. Schölzel-Dorenbos Netherlands
Cadja Bachmann Germany
Allan Gustavo Brígola Brazil
Ana Carolina Ottaviani Brazil
Anne‐Marie Burn United Kingdom
Aline Cristina Martins Gratão Brazil
Sebastian Voigt-Radloff Germany
Jean‐Pierre Aquino France
KlaasJan Hajema Netherlands
Loretto Lacey relative to Marisa Silvana Zazzetta Brazil Marisa Silvana Zazzetta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Marisa Silvana Zazzetta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Loretto Lacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Loretto Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loretto Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loretto Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Loretto Lacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loretto Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loretto Lacey. The network helps show where Loretto Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Loretto Lacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Loretto Lacey Line = papers co-authored together Loretto Lacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011136
2 200771
3 201164
4 201156
5 201449
6 201242
7 201436
8 201435
9 200034
10 201231
11 201026
12 201423
13 201521
14 201520
15 201419
16 201519
17 201117
18 200316
19 201313
20 201313

About Loretto Lacey

Loretto Lacey is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (21 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (19 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (6 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (4 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers), Microscopic Colitis (3 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (124 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (429 citations), General Health Professions (282 citations), Health (89 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (260 citations). Loretto Lacey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Damien Gallagher, Brian Lawlor, Lisa Crosby, Áine Ní Mhaoláin, Robert F. Coen, Conal Cunningham, Davis Coakley, Cathal Walsh, Timothy Niecko and Martin Buxton. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Value in Health, PharmacoEconomics, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Aging & Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact