Loretta Gaido
About
In The Last Decade
Loretta Gaido
7 papers receiving 700 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Epidemiology 456
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 143
- Clinical Biochemistry 142
- Infectious Diseases 134
- Molecular Biology 108
Countries citing papers authored by Loretta Gaido
This map shows the geographic impact of Loretta Gaido's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loretta Gaido with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loretta Gaido more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Loretta Gaido
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loretta Gaido. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loretta Gaido. The network helps show where Loretta Gaido may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Loretta Gaido
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Loretta Gaido. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Loretta Gaido based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Loretta Gaido. Loretta Gaido is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 83 | |
| 2 | 38 | |
| 3 | 489 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 92 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.