Lore K. Wright

708 citations
18 papers · 545 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Lore K. Wright

18 papers receiving 492 citations

Peers

Lore K. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 25
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 210
  • Health 81
  • Clinical Psychology 170
  • General Health Professions 187
Replace Peter Donahue with:
Peter Donahue Canada
Lynda L. Cafasso United States
Anne E. Noonan United States
Tula Brannelly United Kingdom
Jong Won Min United States
Song-Iee Hong Singapore
Rosa Marina Afonso Portugal
Caroline Rosenthal Gelman United States
Geraldine Boyle United Kingdom
Eileen E. MaloneBeach United States
Lore K. Wright relative to Peter Donahue Canada Peter Donahue's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Peter Donahue · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lore K. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lore K. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lore K. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lore K. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lore K. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lore K. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lore K. Wright. The network helps show where Lore K. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Lore K. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lore K. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Lore K. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199196
2 199988
3 200176
4 199838
5 199437
6 199531
7 199430
8 198829
9 199829
10 199424
11 199820
12 199019
13
Alzheimer's disease and marriage : an intimate account
199315
14 19854
15 20003
16 19983
17 19882
18 19821

About Lore K. Wright

Lore K. Wright is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 545 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (7 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (25 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (210 citations), Health (81 citations), Clinical Psychology (170 citations) and General Health Professions (187 citations). Lore K. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Jin‐Sun Kim, Joanne V. Hickey, Kathleen C. Buckwalter, Judy Kaye, Shirley Hendrix, Teresa J. Kelechi, Timothy H. Brubaker, Elizabeth C. Clipp, Lou F. Gramling and Leonard W. Poon. Their work appears in journals such as The Gerontologist, Sexuality and Disability, Social Science & Medicine, Advances in Nursing Science and Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact