Loni Townsley
About
In The Last Decade
Loni Townsley
9 papers receiving 403 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Molecular Biology 248
- Endocrinology 180
- Genetics 91
- Molecular Medicine 68
- Ecology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Loni Townsley
This map shows the geographic impact of Loni Townsley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loni Townsley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loni Townsley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Loni Townsley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loni Townsley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loni Townsley. The network helps show where Loni Townsley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Loni Townsley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Loni Townsley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Loni Townsley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Loni Townsley. Loni Townsley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 61 | |
| 3 | 55 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 55 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 84 | |
| 8 | CdiA promotes receptor-independent intercellular adhesion: BamA-independent CdiA-mediated adhesion | 1 |
| 9 | 46 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.